Introduction: Flexor tendon lacerations in zone II have been reported to be the most complicated of all tendon injuries. Currently, there is no consensus on treatment in surgical management for patients with flexor tendon laceration of flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the repair of FDS tendons provided superior functional outcomes compared with FDS excision in Hispanic patients. Methods: Total active motion, original Strickland criteria, and the disability of arm shoulder and hand questionnaire were provided postoperatively at 3 and 6 months to all consecutive Hispanic patients who underwent zone II flexor tendon repair. The cohort was divided into two groups, those who underwent FDS repair and those underwent FDS excision. Results: Functional and disability outcome analysis showed a notable improvement with FDS repair using total active motion, Strickland criteria, and disability of arm shoulder and hand score at the 3 months postoperative interval. No statistical differences were identified regarding functional and disability outcomes at the 6-month evaluation between both groups. Conclusions: Among Hispanics, the FDS-repaired group had similar functional and disability outcomes at their 6 months postoperative evaluation compared with the FDS-excised group. Increased awareness for tendon rerupture during the initial 3 months of index surgery is recommended for FDS-excised patients.

Background:Adequate pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with improved patient mobility and satisfaction, and is a task that has historically relied on opioids. Multimodal analgesic regimens can be considered a therapeutic alternative for postoperative pain control to avoid opioid consumption and its adverse side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the use of a multimodal analgesia protocol based on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen as an alternative to reduce opioid consumption in Hispanic patients undergoing primary TKA.Methods:An institutional review board-approved, randomized controlled trial evaluated postoperative pain control after TKA in a Hispanic population. The experimental opioid-sparing group received 30-mg ketorolac intravenously every 6 hours and 1-g acetaminophen orally every 6 hours as the patient requested. The experimental group had the option to use morphine and oxycodone combined with acetaminophen as a rescue therapy. The control group received opioids in the form of 0.1-mg/kg morphine intravenously every 6 hours and/or oxycodone combined with acetaminophen (2.5 and 325 mg), 2 tablets orally every 6 hours, as the patient requested. Sociodemographic, operative, and immediate postoperative data and pain intensity measurements according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) were compared between groups. Analgesic efficacy was assessed according to the NRS scores at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively.Results:Eighty-one Hispanic patients met inclusion criteria: 42 patients in the experimental group and 39 patients in the control group. None of the patients in the experimental group requested oxycodone combined with acetaminophen as a rescue therapy. Only 2 patients in the experimental group used a mean of 3.0 ± 1.4 mg of rescue morphine; in comparison, the control group consumed a mean of 28.0 ± 7.9 mg of morphine and 64.8 ± 26.0 mg of oxycodone per patient. A pain intensity decrease was observed in the experimental and control groups, with no postoperative evaluation differences at 12 hours (6.7 ± 2.9 compared with 5.9 ± 2.8; p = 0.209), 24 hours (6.2 ± 2.0 compared with 6.1 ± 2.2; p = 0.813), and 48 hours (4.7 ± 2.1 compared with 4.6 ± 1.7; p = 0.835).Conclusions:The use of a multimodal analgesic regimen based on intravenous ketorolac and oral acetaminophen was adequate in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption in Hispanic patients undergoing TKA.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: There is a controversy in the management of distal radius fractures (DRF) and its criteria for surgical intervention on geriatric patients. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) developed evidence-based guidelines for treatment of DRF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice of Hispanic orthopedic surgeons in the management of geriatric DRF and examine their adherence to AAOS guidelines based on years of surgical experience. Material & Methods: A survey was emailed to all orthopedic surgeons who live in Puerto Rico and treated DRF in their daily practice. Responses concerning demographic, management and clinical scenarios were evaluated. For each clinical scenario, treatment of choice was selected with the same fracture in a geriatric and young adult patient. Comparison between years of surgical experience and adherence to the AAOS guidelines was performed. Results: A total of 65 surgeons responded the survey with 65% having >15 years in practice. A high consensus with AAOS guidelines for DRF was found. Use of preoperative radiographs was reported in all respondents, with an additional 12% routine use of preoperative computed tomography scans. Seventy-seven percent of respondents did not allow any range of motion (ROM) at immediate postoperative period, while 23% allowed active or passive ROM. Use of postoperative therapy was reported in 72.3%. Correlation between years of surgical experience showed a higher use of Vitamin C postoperatively for prophylaxis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome among surgeons <15 years (P = 0.01). A general consensus trend toward operative fixation was noted among geriatric and young adult patients with the same fracture type in all clinical scenarios. Discussion and Conclusions: This survey demonstrates a practice variation toward surgical management of geriatric DRF among Hispanic orthopedic surgeons; despite their compliance with the AAOS AUC guidelines. The geriatric DRF management does not vary significantly among years of surgical experience.

Background Spastic joint contractures remain a complex and challenging condition. For patients with upper extremity spastic dysfunction, improving the muscle balance is essential to maximize their hand function. Multiple procedures, including proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and wrist arthrodesis (WA), are considered among the different surgical alternatives. However, the biomechanical consequences of these two procedures have not been well described in current literature. Hence, the objective of our study is to assess the change in the extrinsic digit flexor tendon resting length after proximal row carpectomy and wrist arthrodesis. Methods Six fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities (four females and two males) with no obvious deformity underwent dissection, PRC, and WA. All the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons were marked proximally 1-cm distal to their respective myotendinous junction and cut distally at the marked point. The overlapping segment of each distal flexor tendon from its proximal mark was considered the amount of flexor tendon resting length change after PRC and WA. A descriptive evaluation was performed to assess the increment in tendon resting length. Additionally, a regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relation between the tendon resting length and the proximal carpal row height. Results Following PRC and WA, the mean digit flexor tendon resting length increment achieved across all tendons was 1.88 cm (standard deviation [SD] = 0.45; range: 1.00–3.00 cm). A weak direct relationship (R = 0.0334) between the increment in tendon resting length and proximal carpal row height was initially suggested, although no statistical significance was demonstrated (p = 0.811). Conclusion This study provides an anatomic description of the increased extrinsic digit flexor tendon resting length after PRC and WA in cadaveric specimens. Findings provide a useful framework to estimate the amount of extrinsic digit flexor resting length increment achieved after wrist fusion and the proximal carpal row removal.