Subjects with frailty syndrome had higher BP evaluated by ABPM and other cardiovascular risk factors such as lower HDL and more abdominal fat than nonfrailty group.
Increased levels of metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 have been shown in hypertensive patients. Lercanidipine is a calcium channel blocker with antioxidant actions. We examined whether lercanidipine produces antioxidant effects and reduces MMP-9 activity in hypertensive patients in a placebo-controlled, crossover, single-blinded design study including 18 healthy volunteers (control group), and 14 hypertensive patients without (N = 7) or with (N = 7) diabetes mellitus. Hypertensive patients were randomized to treatment with placebo (15 days) or lercanidipine 20 mg/d (15 days). Arterial blood pressure was evaluated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBA-RS) levels were measured to assess oxidative stress, and plasma MMP-2 and MMP-9 were assayed by gel zymography before and after treatment with placebo or lercanidipine. Plasma concentrations of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 were measured by ELISA. Lercanidipine reduced mean arterial pressure by 7% in hypertensive patients without diabetes (P < 0.05), but not in hypertensive patients with diabetes. It significantly decreased plasma TBA-RS levels in hypertensive patients without and with diabetes (95% confidence interval [CI], -26 to -46%, P = 0.048, and -22 to -33%, P = 0.036, respectively). In addition, lercanidipine decreased activated MMP-9 in hypertensive patients without and with diabetes (95% CI, -19 to -47%, P = 0.047, and -80 to -96%, P = 0.010, respectively). No effects were seen on MMP-2. No significant differences or changes in plasma TIMP-1 concentrations were found. Therefore, we demonstrate for the first time that lercanidipine consistently decreased MMP-9 activity and reduced oxidative stress in hypertensive patients, thus suggesting a mechanism probably involved in the pleotropic actions of lercanidipine.
Citalopram (CITA) is available as a racemic mixture and as a pure enantiomer. Its antidepressive action is related to the (+)-(S)-CITA and to the metabolite (+)-(S)-demethylcitalopram (DCITA). In the present investigation, a method for the analysis of CITA and DCITA enantiomers in human and rat plasma was developed and applied to the study of pharmacokinetics. Plasma samples (1 ml) were extracted at pH 9.0 with toluene:isoamyl alcohol (9:1, v/v). The CITA and DCITA enantiomers were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a Chiralcel OD-R column. Recovery was higher than 70% for both enantiomers. The quantification limit was 0.1 ng/ml, and linearity was observed up to 500 ng/ml plasma for each CITA and DCITA enantiomer. The method was applied to the study of the kinetic disposition of CITA administered in a single oral dose of 20 mg to a healthy volunteer and in a single dose of 20 mg/kg (by gavage) to Wistar rats (n = 6 for each time). The results showed a higher proportion of the (-)-(R)-CITA in human and rat plasma, with S/R AUC ratios for CITA of 0.28 and 0.44, respectively. S/R AUC ratios of DCITA were 0.48 for rats and 1.04 for the healthy volunteer.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• Pharmacokinetic interactions between albendazole and praziquantel are based on plasma concentrations of the enantiomeric mixture of both drugs with contradictory data, although the antiparasitic activity arises from (-)-(R)-praziquantel and (+)-albendazole sulfoxide.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• The pharmacokinetic interaction between albendazole and praziquantel is enantioselective. Praziquantel increased the plasma concentrations of (+)-albendazole sulfoxide more than those of (-)-albendazole sulfoxide and the administration of albendazole did not change the kinetic disposition of (+)-(S)-praziquantel, but increased the plasma concentration of (-)-(R)-praziquantel.
AIMThis study investigated the kinetic disposition, metabolism and enantioselectivity of albendazole (ABZ) and praziquantel (PZQ) administered alone and in combination to healthy volunteers.
METHODSA randomized crossover study was carried out in three phases (n = 9), in which some volunteers started in phase 1 (400 mg ABZ), others in phase 2 (1500 mg PZQ), and the remaining volunteers in phase 3 (400 mg ABZ + 1500 mg PZQ). Serial blood samples were collected from 0-48 h after drug administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a monocompartmental model with lag time and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test; P Յ 0.05.
RESULTSThe administration of PZQ increased the plasma concentrations of (+)-ASOX (albendazole sulphoxide) by 264% (AUC 0.99 vs. 2.59 mg ml -1 h), (-)-ASOX by 358% (0.14 vs. 0.50 mg ml -1 h) and albendazole sulfone (ASON) by 187% (0.17 vs. 0.32 mg ml -1 h). The administration of ABZ did not change the kinetic disposition of (+)-(S)-PZQ (-)-(R)-4-OHPZQ or (+)-(S)-4-OHPZQ, but increased the plasma concentration of (-)-(R)-PZQ by 64.77% (AUC 0.52 vs. 0.86 mg ml -1 h).
CONCLUSIONSThe pharmacokinetic interaction between ABZ and PZQ in healthy volunteers was demonstrated by the observation of increased plasma concentrations of ASON, both ASOX enantiomers and (-)-(R)-PZQ. Clinically, the combination of ABZ and PZQ may improve the therapeutic efficacy as a consequence of higher concentration of both active drugs. On the other hand, the magnitude of this elevation may represent an increased risk of side effects, requiring, certainly, reduction of the dosage. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.
The present data permit us to infer that type-2 diabetes mellitus alters the kinetic disposition of the (+)-N eutomer and (-)-N distomer, presumably due to a lower activity of CYP3A4, although it does not modify the clinical effect brought about by the reduction in BP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.