No abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with structural, electrical, and contractile remodeling of the atria. Development and progression of atrial fibrosis is the hallmark of structural remodeling in AF and is considered the substrate for AF perpetuation. In contrast, experimental and clinical data on the effect of ventricular fibrotic processes in the pathogenesis of AF and its complications are controversial. Ventricular fibrosis seems to contribute to abnormalities in cardiac relaxation and contractility and to the development of heart failure, a common finding in AF. Given that AF and heart failure frequently coexist and that both conditions affect patient prognosis, a better understanding of the mutual effect of fibrosis in AF and heart failure is of particular interest. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the general mechanisms of cardiac fibrosis in AF, differences between fibrotic processes in atria and ventricles, and the clinical and prognostic significance of cardiac fibrosis in AF.

The important role of the vascular endothelium in cardiovascular health is increasingly recognized. However, mature endothelial cells possess limited regenerative capacity. There is therefore much interest in circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) among the scientific community, especially into their purported role in maintenance of endothelial integrity and function, as well as postnatal neovascularization. It has been suggested that these cells might not only be responsible for the continuous recovery of the endothelium after injury/damage, but also might take part in angiogenesis, giving the hope of new treatment opportunities. Indeed, there is accumulating evidence showing reduced availability and impaired EPC function in the presence of both cardiovascular disease and associated comorbid risk factors. Thus, many studies into the potential for use of EPCs in the clinical setting are being undertaken. The goal of this review article is to provide an overview of data relevant to the clinical role of EPCs and perspectives for treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Despite improvements in interventional and pharmacological therapy of atherosclerotic disease, it is still the leading cause of death in the developed world. Hence, there is a need for further development of effective therapeutic approaches. This requires better understanding of the molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of the disease. Atherosclerosis has long been identified as having an inflammatory component contributing to its pathogenesis, whereas the available therapy primarily targets hyperlipidemia and prevention of thrombosis. Notwithstanding a pleotropic anti-inflammatory effect to some therapies, such as acetyl salicylic acid and the statins, none of the currently approved medicines for management of either stable or complicated atherosclerosis has inflammation as a primary target. Monocytes, as representatives of the innate immune system, play a major role in the initiation, propagation, and progression of atherosclerosis from a stable to an unstable state. Experimental data support a role of monocytes in acute coronary syndromes and in outcome post-infarction; however, limited research has been done in humans. Analysis of expression of various cell surface receptors allows characterization of the different monocyte subsets phenotypically, whereas downstream assessment of inflammatory pathways provides an insight into their activity. In this review we discuss the functional role of monocytes and their different subpopulations in atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndromes, cardiac healing, and recovery with an aim of critical evaluation of potential future therapeutic targets in atherosclerosis and its complications. We will also discuss technical difficulties of delineating different monocyte subpopulations, understanding their differentiation potential and function.

New vessel formation inside the arterial wall and atherosclerotic plaques plays a critical role in pathogenesis of heart attacks and strokes. The 2 known mechanisms resulting in the formation of new vessels within the plaque are local ischemia and inflammation. Blood monocytes play an important role in both processes. First, they express receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor and some of them may serve as circulating ancestors of endothelial cells. Second, monocytes are associated with inflammation by synthesis of inflammatory molecules following their activation (e.g., after stimulation of Toll-like receptors). Neovascularization is a reparative response to ischemia, and includes 3 processes: angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, and vasculogenesis. Angiogenesis, the formation of new capillary vessels is known to occur in response to a hypoxic environment. The interaction between leukocytes and vascular wall via overexpression of various molecules facilitates the migration of inflammatory cells into the plaque microenvironment. Monocytes are intimately involved in tissue damage and repair and an imbalance of these processes may have detrimental consequences for plaque development and stability. Importantly, monocytes are comprised of distinct subsets with different cell surface markers and functional characteristics and this heterogeneity may be relevant to angiogenic processes in atherosclerosis. The aim of this review article is to present an overview of the available evidence supporting a role for monocytes in angiogenesis and atherosclerosis.

Summary.  Objectives: Monocytes include several subsets with different and sometimes divergent roles in immunity, atherogenesis and reparative processes. Objectives: We aimed to perform detailed immunophenotypic and functional characterization of human monocyte subsets. Patients/methods: Analysis of surface markers of blood and bone marrow monocyte subsets and functional characterization of blood monocyte subsets in healthy volunteers was performed using flow cytometry. Results: In the present study, we show the presence of three subsets which could be unequivocally distinguished by surface expression of CD14, CD16 and CCR2 as CD14+CD16−CCR2+(Mon1), CD14+CD16+CCR2+(Mon2) and CD14lowCD16+CCR2−(Mon3) subsets. In comparison with the classic Mon1, the Mon2 subset had the highest expression of Tie2, CXCR4, CD163, CD115, receptors to inter‐cellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and the highest surface levels of apolipoprotein B and ferritin. In contrast, Mon3 had maximal expression of VCAM‐1 receptors and CD204. The Mon2 and Mon3 subsets had significantly lower activity of the NFκB pathway than Mon1. Mon1 and Mon2 had similar phagocytic activity, which was significantly higher compared with Mon3. All three subsets were present in bone marrow, although the relative proportion of Mon2 in bone marrow was about 2.5‐fold higher compared with that seen in blood. Significant differences in cytokine production in response to endotoxin stimulation were observed between the three monocyte subsets. Conclusion: Given their immunophenotypic similarity, the newly characterized Mon2 population may represent the previously reported pluripotent progenitor/pro‐angiogenic monocytes.

Summary. Aim: Monocytes contribute to both myocardial damage and repair by virtue of subset heterogeneity. The dynamics and functional characteristics of the three human monocyte subsets, including the unique CD14++CD16+ subset, and their contributions to monocyte platelet aggregates (MPAs) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are unknown. We aimed to examine dynamic changes and relation to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the three human monocyte subsets and their aggregates with platelets following STEMI. Methods: Three monocyte subsets, CD14++CD16)CCR2+ (ÔclassicalÕ, Mon1), CD14++CD16+CCR2+ (ÔintermediateÕ, Mon2) and CD14+CD16++CCR2) (Ônon-classicalÕ, Mon3), and their contribution to MPAs were analyzed by flow cytometry in 50 patients with STEMI, 40 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and 40 healthy volunteers. Study parameters were measured within 24 h of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (day1) and on days 3, 7 and 30. Monocyte activation was assessed by measuring the nuclear factor jB (NFjB) pathway. LVEF was assessed 6 weeks after STEMI. Correlations between monocyte subsets/MPAs and plasma cytokines and troponin were assessed. Results: We observed marked differences in subset dynamics, with a prominent increase in Mon2 (P < 0.0001) but no changes in Mon3. Significant increases in Mon2 CD14 (P = 0.002) and CCR2 (P < 0.0001) expression, and reduction in CD16 expression (P = 0.001) were seen. NFjB pathway activity increased most prominently in Mon2 (P = 0.007). Mon2 count correlated with peak troponin (r = 0.31, P = 0.04) and plasma interleukin (IL)-6 (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001) and IL-10 (r = 0.34, P = 0.017). Mon1 correlated with IL-6 (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Reduced Mon2 expression of CD16 on day 1 was independently predictive of higher LVEF (b = )0.37, P = 0.013). The increase in MPA count following STEMI persisted at 1 month. Conclusion: The Mon2 ÔintermediateÕ subset has unique dynamic and functional characteristics following STEMI and significant correlations with troponin, plasma cytokines and convalescent left ventricular function. The persistent increase in MPA count 30 days after STEMI may affect monocyte subset functional activity.

There is growing evidence to support an important role of inflammation in the underlying pathophysiology of heart failure (HF). Indeed, inflammatory cytokine levels are well recognized to be increased in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and appear to have prognostic implications. Monocytes play a pivotal role in the inflammatory cascade and are a major source of both pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines. They are intimately involved in tissue damage and repair and an imbalance of these processes may have detrimental consequences for the failing myocardium. Importantly, monocytes comprise of distinct subsets with different cell surface markers and functional characteristics and this heterogeneity may be important in understanding their specific role in HF. In HF, monocyte activation involves interplay between pattern recognition molecules, endotoxins, cytokines, and acute phase proteins. Activated monocytes migrate to the myocardium in response to powerful chemokines, where they must then attach to the endothelial wall before infiltrating into the myocardium itself. This review article aims to discuss the role of monocytes and inflammation in HF, focusing on monocyte activation, mobilisation, recruitment and endothelial adherence, as well as the effects they may have on myocardial performance. The therapeutic modulation of inflammation and monocyte activation in HF treatment will also be reviewed.--