A large monoinstitutional series adopting the Kugel retroparietal technique for inguinal hernia surgery is analysed. Our aim is to assess the "mini-invasiveness" of this technique. Six hundred and twenty patients (pts) affected by monolateral inguinal hernia were treated with a preperitoneal alloplasty with a posterior approach (Kugel hernia repair, KHR) between January 2002 and September 2004. The surgical incision extension was 3.5 cm on average (range 2-4.5). The mean operation time was 33 min (range 20-45). Spinal anaesthesia and ambulatory procedure were applied in 595 cases (96%). Postoperative complications affected 20 pts (3%). The postoperative pain was well controlled. No chronic neuropathic pain was registered at follow-up. Patients resumed work after an average of 9 days (range 7-12) from operation. Recurrence rate was 0.8%. Conclusions. The Kugel hernia repair satisfies the standards to be awarded as a "mini-invasive" technique.
Laparoscopic BPD is a safe technique; has good results without affecting the duration of the intervention; and ensures less postoperative pain with rapid functional recovery, less hospital stay, and drastic reduction of incisional hernia incidence.
Plug insertion for primary femoral hernia repair may cause p.o. discomfort. The Kugel technique may avoid this problem. Patients' satisfaction to the Kugel and the plug techniques is compared in the present study. Demographics, surgical, outcome and analgesic consumption data of 26 patients treated for with the plug technique (P group) are compared with 24 operated with the Kugel patch (K group). Patients' p.o. discomfort to the two procedures was measured with quantitative (VAS score) and a qualitative (the short form of McGill pain questionnaire, SF-MPQ) methods, and compared. P group presented higher early p.o. pain (P<0.001), higher analgesic consumption and a significative delay in the return to physical activity (P<0.001). SF-MPQ scores at p.o. day 8, day 30 and month 6 were significantly lower for K group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.005). The Kugel technique for femoral hernia treatment seems to cause less p.o. discomfort to patients than the plug technique.
Delayed gastric emptying after distal gastrectomy and reconstruction of alimentary tract with a gastroenteric anastomosis can significantly influence early and late postoperative course and the length of hospital stay. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect on postoperative functional recovery of two different Roux-en-Y reconstructions: at the gastric greater curvature and at the transected gastric staple line in the Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion. We conducted comparative study; 80 patients were enrolled and divided in two groups: group A (RY-GC) and group B (RY-SL) with 40 patients in each group. We compared the early postoperative functional recovery for both groups measuring four parameters: gastric stasis indicated with the volume of the gastric fluid collected per 24 h, day of removal of the nasogastric tube, day of starting the oral intake, and day of hospital discharge. There was statistically significant (p < 0.001) reduction in gastric fluid volume in favor of the RY-GC group starting from the first postoperative day resulting in earlier removal of nasogastric tube with earlier starting of oral feeding than RY-SL group, with no symptoms of stasis required nutrition suspension; while three patients in RY-SL group experienced persistence of nausea and vomiting and needed nutrition suspension for several days. There was statistically significant (p < 0.001) reduction in the hospital stay for RY-GC group. Roux-en-Y reconstruction at the greater curvature ensures a rapid functional recovery with early hospital discharge. The use of stapler devices made this method easier and safer and no complications have arisen with mechanical anastomoses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.