Background: Hurricanes are the immediate ways that people experience climate impacts in the Caribbean. These events affect socio-ecological systems and lead to major disruptions in the healthcare system, having effects on health outcomes. In September 2017, Puerto Rico (PR) and the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) experienced one of the most catastrophic hurricane seasons in recent history (Hurricane Irma was a Category 5 and Hurricane María was a Category 4 when they hit PR). Objective: This study examines environmental stressors experienced by women with gynecologic (GYN) cancers from PR and USVI who received oncologic cancer care in PR, in the aftermath of the hurricanes. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design was used to obtain rich information for understanding the context, barriers, knowledge, perspectives, risks, vulnerabilities, and attitudes associated to these hurricanes. We performed focus groups among GYN cancer patients (n = 24) and key-informant interviews (n = 21) among health-care providers and administrators. Interviews were conducted from December 2018–April 2019. Results: Environmental health stressors such as lack of water, heat and uncomfortable temperatures, air pollution (air quality), noise pollution, mosquitos, and rats ranked in the top concerns among cancer patients and key-informants. Conclusions: These findings are relevant to cancer patients, decision-makers, and health providers facing extreme events and disasters in the Caribbean. Identifying environmental secondary stressors and the most relevant cascading effects is useful for decision-makers so that they may address and mitigate the effects of hurricanes on public health and cancer care.

Increasing violence-related distress over time was associated with worse lung function and worse asthma-related quality of life in youth with asthma despite treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.Exposure to violence has been associated with lower lung function in cross-sectional studies. We examined whether increasing violence-related distress over time is associated with worse lung function and worse asthma control or quality of life in a secondary analysis of a 48-week randomized clinical trial in 98 youth with asthma (ages 9–16 years) treated with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (the Vitamin D Kids Asthma Study [VDKA]). We then replicated our findings for lung function in a prospective study of 232 Puerto Rican youth followed for an average of 5·4 years. Violence-related distress was assessed using the Checklist of Children's Distress Symptoms (CCDS) scale. Our outcomes of interest were percent predicted (%pred) lung function measures and (in VDKA only) asthma control (assessed using the Asthma Control Test) and asthma-related quality of life (assessed using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire). In a multivariable analysis in VDKA, each 1-point increment in the CCDS score was associated with decrements of 3.27% in %predFEV1 (95% confidence interval [CI]=−6.44% to −0.22%, p=0.04) and a 2.65% decrement in percent predicted FVC (95% CI=−4.86% to −0.45%, p=0.02), and 0.30 points in the overall PAQLQ score (95% CI=−0.50 to −0.10, p<0.01). Similar findings for FEV1 and FVC were obtained in the prospective study of Puerto Rican youth. Our findings suggest that violence-related distress may worsen lung function and quality of life in youth with asthma (even those treated with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids) and further support policies to reduce exposure to violence among children in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract