The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for diagnosis of diabetes is inconvenient and requires a great deal of patient cooperation. Glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb), an index of long-term glycemic control, could offer several practical advantages over the OGTT for diabetes screening. We evaluated GHb as a screen for diabetes in 381 adults from a population with a high prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes (Pima Indians). All individuals underwent a standard OGTT (75 g) and were separated into one of three groups: normal (N), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or diabetes mellitus (D) based on World Health Organization criteria. HbA1c, a GHb, was measured by highly precise high-performance liquid chromatography (interassay C.V. less than 4%). The normal range for HbA1c was 4.07-6.03% based on the 95% confidence interval for a nondiabetic, mostly Caucasian population. Compared with OGTT, HbA1c was highly specific (91%); an elevated HbA1c usually indicated D or IGT (sensitivity = 85 and 30%, respectively). A normal HbA1c did not, however, exclude a diagnosis of D or IGT. Based on previous epidemiological studies relating plasma glucose to chronic diabetic complications, GHb as measured in this study would properly identify the vast majority of subjects at risk. Long-term studies are necessary to determine the actual risk of complications in individuals with persistently normal HbA1c and D or IGT (based on OGTT).
Recent studies suggest that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is underdiagnosed. To test this hypothesis, we examined the relationship of perinatal complications to glucose tolerance during the third trimester. Our population consisted of 287 women evaluated at approximately 28 wk gestation who had normal fasting (less than 5.9 mM) and 2-h (less than 9.2 mM plasma glucose) levels after a 100-g glucose load. Glycosylated hemoglobin and glycosylated plasma protein were also measured. Study subjects were stratified into three groups based on 2-h plasma glucose values: group 1 (n = 59) less than 5.6 mM, group 2 (n = 112) 5.6-6.0 mM, and group 3 (n = 116) 6.7-9.2 mM. There were statistically significant but low correlations (r less than 0.20) between 2-h plasma glucose levels and mother's age, body mass index, infant weights, and Apgar scores. There was a significant increasing trend in the proportion of overweight and obese women from groups 1 to 3 (P less than 0.02). There was also a significant trend toward higher birth weights (P = 0.013) and larger proportions of large for gestational age (LGA) babies (P = 0.02) from groups 1 to 3, and women with LGA infants showed higher fasting and 2-h plasma glucose levels than women with non-LGA infants (P = 0.032). However, there was no significant difference in perinatal complications or infant morbidity or mortality between groups. Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin or glycosylated plasma protein did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
We present data on a filter-paper collection and assay method for measurement of glycated hemoglobin (gHb). Onto filter paper dipped into a solution of glucose oxidase (EC 1.1.3.4) and allowed to dry, approximately 20 microL of capillary blood was spotted. For analysis, we eluted the dried blood spot from the paper by soaking in water for 1 h, then measured the gHb in the eluate by affinity chromatography. Because the gHb significantly increased from day 1 to day 14 of storage, it was necessary to standardize the day of elution from the paper. We found a high correlation between gHb measured from samples stored for 14 days on treated paper and gHb measured by affinity chromatography from frozen whole blood or hemolysates (r = 0.96). This method is convenient, requiring small amounts of blood and little sample handling and assay time, and may be particularly useful in certain situations such as large-scale screening for diabetes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.