Because of a continuing need for pathological staging of clinical stage I testicular tumors an investigation was performed to determine the primary sites of metastatic involvement of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and to define narrowly limited ipsilateral areas of lymph node dissection strictly for the purpose of staging. Surgical/pathological localization of solitary metastases provides the most direct evidence of primary lymphatic spread. There were 214 consecutive patients with stage II disease (excluding bulky disease) evaluated with respect to localization relative to the side of the involved testis and the number of metastases up to 5 cm. Solitary metastases of 5 cm. or less were found in 74 patients, 53 patients had 5 or less lymph nodes of 2 cm. or less and 87 patients had more than 5 lymph nodes of between 2 and 5 cm. Solitary nodes of the right testis tumor were located with decreasing frequency in the upper and lower interaortocaval, lower paracaval and precaval, upper precaval and right common iliac, upper paracaval and upper preaortic zones. Primary deposits of the left testis tumor were seen predominantly in the upper para-aortic zone. Upper preaortic and lower para-aortic zones were involved infrequently, and other areas were affected only in rare cases. These data contradict the assumption of a testicular lymph center located at the openings of the testicular veins into the vena cava and left renal vein, respectively. Multiple metastases were spread over the entire retroperitoneum, except for the external iliac regions. Hilar/suprahilar metastases were seen infrequently. Ipsilateral areas are defined according to primary involvement. A modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection within ipsilateral areas is proposed as a staging operation for clinical stage I disease and a radical retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is indicated for pathological stage II disease.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Optimal treatment for incidental prostate cancer (IPC) after surgical treatment for benign prostate obstruction is still debatable. We report on long-term outcomes of IPC patients managed with active surveillance (AS) in a German multicenter study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> HAROW (2008–2013) was designed as a noninterventional, prospective, health-service research study for patients with localized prostate cancer (≤cT2), including patients with IPC (cT1a/b). A follow-up examination of all patients treated with AS was carried out. Overall, cancer-specific, and metastasis-free survival and discontinuation rates were determined. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 210 IPC patients, 68 opted for AS and were available for evaluation. Fifty-four patients had cT1a category and 14 cT1b category. Median follow-up was 7.7 years (IQR: 5.7–9.1). Eight patients died of which 6 were still under AS or watchful waiting (WW). No PCa-specific death could be observed. One patient developed metastasis. Twenty-three patients (33.8%) discontinued AS changing to invasive treatment: 12 chose radical prostatectomy, 7 radiotherapy, and 4 hormonal treatment. Another 19 patients switched to WW. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year overall, cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and intervention-free survival was 83.8% (95% CI: 72.2–95.3), 100%, 98.4% (95% CI: 95.3–99.9), and 61.0% (95% CI: 47.7–74.3), respectively. In multivariable analysis, age (RR: 0.97; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), PSA density ≥0.2 ng/mL² (RR: 13.23; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), and PSA ≥1.0 ng/mL after surgery (RR: 5.19; <i>p</i> = 0.016) were significantly predictive for receiving an invasive treatment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In comparison with other AS series with a general low-risk prostate cancer population, our study confirmed the promising survival outcomes for IPC patients, whereas discontinuation rates seem to be lower for IPC. Thus, IPC patients at low risk of progression may be good candidates for AS.

No abstract

No abstract