OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to estimate the accuracy of the postural assessment software (PAS/SAPO) for measurement of corporal angles and distances as well as the inter- and intra-rater reliabilities.INTRODUCTION:Postural assessment software was developed as a subsidiary tool for postural assessment. It is easy to use and available in the public domain. Nonetheless, validation studies are lacking.METHODS:The study sample consisted of 88 pictures from 22 subjects, and each subject was assessed twice (1 week interval) by 5 blinded raters. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. To estimate the accuracy of the software, an inanimate object was marked with hallmarks using pre-established parameters. Pictures of the object were rated, and values were checked against the known parameters.RESULTS:Inter-rater reliability was excellent for 41% of the variables and very good for 35%. Ten percent of the variables had acceptable reliability, and 14% were defined as non-acceptable. For intra-rater reliability, 44.8% of the measurements were considered to be excellent, 23.5% were very good, 12.4% were acceptable and 19.3% were considered non-acceptable. Angular measurements had a mean error analisys of 0.11°, and the mean error analisys for distance was 1.8 mm.DISCUSSION:Unacceptable intraclass correlation coefficient values typically used the vertical line as a reference, and this may have increased the inaccuracy of the estimates. Increased accuracies were obtained by younger raters with more sophisticated computer skills, suggesting that past experience influenced results.CONCLUSION:The postural assessment software was accurate for measuring corporal angles and distances and should be considered as a reliable tool for postural assessment.
Both methods for signal analysis from OCT allowed detection of demineralization with good performance. The AUC-OCT approach enables obtaining a linear relation with the microhardness results, for a quantitative assessment of mineral loss in human teeth.
Previous research in our laboratory has shown that the polarization component of the electrical field plays an important role on the healing process of inflammatory lesions created in the end of the spinal column of Lewis rats, using a He-Ne laser at lambda = 632.8 nm. It is well known that polarization is lost in a turbid medium, such as living tissue. However, the Nd:YLF wavelength (lambda = 1,047 nm) allows more polarization preservation than lambda = 632.8 nm, and the Nd:YLF laser beam has been used in clinical trials as a biostimulating agent. In this work, we investigated the influence of a low-intensity, linearly polarized Nd:YLF laser beam on skin wound healing, considering two orthogonal directions of polarization. We have considered a preferential axis as the animals' spinal column, and we aligned the linear laser polarization first parallel, then perpendicular to this direction. Burns of about 6 mm in diameter were created with liquid N2 on the back of the animals, and the lesions were irradiated on days 3, 7, 10, and 14 postwounding, D = 1.0 J/cm2. Lesions 1 and 2 were illuminated using Nd:YLF pulsed laser radiation. Lesion 1 was irradiated with linear polarization parallel with the rat spinal column. Lesion 2 was irradiated using the same protocol, but the light polarization was aligned with the perpendicular relative orientation. Control lesions were not irradiated. We have taken photographs from the wound areas on the 3rd, 7th, 10th, 14th, and 17th postoperative day for a biometrical analysis. The results have shown that lesion 1 healed faster than the control lesions (p < 0,05), which presented a smaller degree of healing after 14 days postwounding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.