BackgroundPrevious population-based studies have demonstrated an association between metformin use and improved survival among diabetic patients with cancer. We sought to analyze the effects of diabetes and its treatment in terms of the survival of patients with lung cancer.MethodsOverall, 1106 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (94.3 % with stage IV disease) were included. The outcomes were compared between the patients with (n = 186) and without diabetes (n = 920). The characteristics associated with antidiabetic treatment and proper glycemic control (defined as a mean plasma glucose <130 mg/dL) were examined at diagnosis. The overall survivals (OSs) of the different patient populations were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the influences of the patient and tumor characteristics on survival.ResultsThe OS for the entire population was 18.3 months (95 % CI 16.1-20.4). There was no difference in the OSs of the diabetic and non-diabetic patients (18.5 vs 16.4 months, p = 0.62). The diabetic patients taking metformin exhibited a superior OS than did those on other antidiabetic treatments (25.6 vs 13.2 months, p = 0.017). Those with proper glycemic control had a better OS than did those without proper glycemic control and the non-diabetics (40.5 vs 13.2 and 18.5 months, respectively, p < 0.001). Both the use of metformin (HR 0.53, p < 0.0001 and HR 0.57, p = 0.017, respectively) and proper glycemic control (HR 0.49, p < 0.0001 and HR 0.40, p = 0.002, respectively) were significant protective factors in all and only diabetic patients, respectively.ConclusionsThe diabetic patients with proper glycemic control exhibited a better OS than did those without proper glycemic control and even exhibited a better OS than did the patients without diabetes mellitus. Metformin use was independently associated with a better OS.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2658-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: In Mexico, breast cancer is the leading cause of death by malignant tumors in women aged 20 and older. The World Health Organization estimates that 69% of deaths caused by breast cancer occur in developing countries. Little is known about the prevalence of breast carcinoma in Mexico and its molecular subclassification.Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent a mastectomy (single, radical or lumpectomy) or a breast tumor biopsy (core-needle or excisional) from January 2002 to December 2018. The primary purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and molecular profile of breast in comprehensive cancer center in Mexico and compare our results with those published in the US. This study was approved by our scientific and bioethical committee. Results:The final analysis included 379 patients. The youngest patient was 23 years old and the oldest patient was 89; the mean age at diagnosis was 54.63 years. Patients of 40 years old or younger accounted for 48 of the cases (12.66%) and those older than 40 accounted for 331 of the cases (87.33%). The molecular subclassification showed luminal A subtype in 139 cases (36.67%), luminal B subtype in 143 cases (37.73%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive carcinomas in 32 cases (8.44%) and triple-negative carcinomas in 65 cases (17.15%). Diabetes mellitus was present in 43 patients (11.34%), hypertension in 78 patients (20.58%), obesity in 82 patients (21.63%) and 66 patients reported being treated with exogenous hormone therapy (17.41%). Conclusions:Breast carcinoma occurs at an earlier age in Mexican women compared to women in the US. Hormone-positive tumors were found to be more prevalent in older patients, while high-grade tumors were more frequently identified in younger patients.

Background: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression predicts immunotherapy utility in nononcogenic addictive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, its reproducibility and reliability may be compromised outside clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with PD-L1 expression in lung ADC. Methods: This observational study assessed 547 tumor samples with advanced lung ADC from January 2016 to December 2020 in a single cancer institution. Tumor samples were stained by at least one approved PD-L1 clone, SP263 (Ventana) or 22C3 (Dako), and stratified in tumor proportion score (TPS) <1%, 1-49%, or ≥50%. Results: Of all the tumor samples, positive PD-L1 staining was higher in poorly differentiated tumors (67.3% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001). Analytical factors associated with a PD-L1 high expression (TPS ≥ 50%) were the SP263 clone (19.6% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001), time of archival tumor tissue <12 months (15.3% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.024), whenever the analysis was performed in the most recent years (2019-2020) (19.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), and whenever the analysis was performed by pathologists in the academic setting (Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, INCan) (19.9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.001). In the molecular analysis, EGFR wild-type tumors had an increased proportion of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 high cases (60.2% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.006 and 17.4% vs.8.5%, p = 0.004). A moderate correlation (r = 0.69) in the PD-L1 TPS% was observed between the two different settings (INCan vs. external laboratories). Conclusion: Clinicopathological factors were associated with an increased PD-L1 positivity rate. These differences were significant in the PD-L1 high group and associated with the academic setting, the SPS263 clone, time of archival tumor tissue <12 months, and a more recent period in the PD-L1 analysis.K E Y W O R D S immunotherapy, lung adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, programmed death-ligand 1 BACKGROUND Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have become the most studied biomarkers in lung cancer. 1 Regardless of the expression site, both Alejandro Avilés-Salas and Diana Flores-Estrada contributed equally to the conception of this work.

No abstract

No abstract