ObjectivesTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new resuscitation tool in the emergency department. Recent studies have demonstrated that it can impact diagnosis and management of critically ill patients. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a simulation-based curriculum for teaching emergency medicine residents a five-view TEE protocol.MethodsEmergency medicine residents with previous ultrasound experience were invited to attend a 1-hour TEE training session. The training consisted of a didactic lecture followed by guided practice on a simulator. Performance was measured prior to training, after the training session, and by a transfer test 1 to 2 weeks after training. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful image generation using a scoring tool by two blinded reviewers.ResultsTwenty-two residents completed the study. The percentage of successful views increased from 44.5% (SD 27.9) at baseline to 98.6% (SD 3.5) after training (p < 0.001), and was 86.8% (SD 12.1) on transfer testing (p < 0.001).ConclusionA brief simulation-based teaching session was effective for teaching emergency medicine residents a five-view resuscitative TEE protocol. Future studies are needed to determine optimal methods for long-term skill retention.
Although echocardiograms are often performed when peritoneal dialysis is started, associations between commonly reported findings and prospective changes in renal function remain understudied. Ninety-nine of 101 patients in the Trio Trial had transthoracic echocardiograms within 6 months of dialysis initiation, and measurements of residual renal function every six weeks for up to two years. Generalized mixed modelling linear regression in STATA was used to examine associations between left atrial size, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular systolic pressure, and left valvular calcification with subsequent slopes in renal function. After echocardiography (performed a median of 16 days following peritoneal dialysis initiation) right ventricular systolic pressure was associated with faster, while declining left ventricular ejection fraction and valvular calcification were associated with slower declines in residual renal function. Future studies could be conducted to confirm these findings, and identify pathophysiological mechanisms.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) modality that is increasingly being used in emergency departments (ED). 1 TEE scans performed in the ED are most commonly used to assist with managing critically ill patients, including those with hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest. In these patients, TEE can help to identify important causes of shock such as left ventricular dysfunction, cardiac tamponade, and massive pulmonary embolism. 1 Emergency physician-performed TEE has been shown to be feasible, can assist with patient diagnosis, and leads to
Innovation Concet: Resuscitative clinician-performed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new ultrasound application that has the potential to guide the management of critically ill patients in the emergency department. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a brief training workshop for teaching a resuscitative TEE protocol to emergency medicine residents using a high-fidelity simulator. Methods: Emergency medicine residents with no prior TEE experience that were rotating through a university-affiliated emergency department were invited to participate in the study. Participants completed a questionnaire and baseline skill assessment using a high-fidelity simulator. The training session included a 20 minute lecture followed by 10 simulated repetitions of a 5-view TEE sequence with instructor feedback. Learning was evaluated by a skill assessment immediately after training and a transfer test 1-2 weeks after the training session. Ultrasound images and transducer motion metrics were captured by the simulator for blinded analysis. The primary outcome of this study was the percentage of successful views before and after training as determined by two blinded reviewers using an anchored scoring tool. Secondary outcomes included time to scan completion and diagnostic accuracy on the transfer test. Assessment scores were compared using a two-tailed t-test. Curriculum, Tool or Material: 22 of 25 (88%) of invited residents agreed to participate in the study. Percentage of successful views increased from 44.5% (SD 27.9) at baseline to 98.6% (SD 3.5) after training (p < 0.001), and was 86.8% (SD 12.1) on transfer testing (p < 0.001). Time to complete the scan was 330 seconds at baseline, 125 seconds after training (p < 0.001), and 184 seconds (p < 0.001) in the transfer test. Participants made the correct diagnosis in 75% (SD 25.6) of the cases in the simulated patient encounter. The descending aorta view had the highest success rate (93.2%) and the midesophageal long axis view had the lowest success rate (75.0%). Conclusion: A brief simulation-based workshop was effective for teaching emergency medicine residents a five-view resuscitative TEE protocol. Future studies are needed to determine optimal methods for long-term skill retention.
Introduction: Resuscitative clinician-performed transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new ultrasound application, however the optimal teaching methods have not been determined. Previous studies have demonstrated that random practice (RP), which increases the variability of training, may improve learning of procedural skills compared with blocked practice (BP). We compared RP and BP for teaching a resuscitative TEE protocol to emergency medicine residents using a simulator. Methods: We recruited emergency medicine residents with no prior TEE experience from a university-affiliated hospital. Participants completed a questionnaire and baseline skill assessment on a simulator, then were randomized to one of two groups. The BP group completed 10 repetitions of a fixed 5-view TEE sequence with instructor feedback, while the RP group completed 10 different random 5-view TEE sequences with feedback. Participants completed a simulation-based performance assessment immediately, and a transfer test consisting of a simulated patient encounter 1-2 weeks after training. Ultrasound images and transducer motion metrics were captured by the simulator for blinded analysis. Our primary outcome was the percentage of successful views on the transfer test, and secondary outcomes included participants confidence level, image quality, percentage of correct diagnoses, and efficiency of movement. We compared all scores using two-tailed, independent samples t-tests. Results: 22 participants completed the study (11 in the RP group, 11 in the BP group). There were no significant baseline differences between the groups. The BP group had a higher rate of successful views compared with the RP group on the transfer test (92.7% vs 80.9%, p=0.02). While not statistically significant, the BP group had higher image quality on a 5-point scale (3.2 vs 2.9, p=0.09), and fewer probe accelerations (297 vs 403, p=0.09). The groups did not differ in rate of correct diagnoses (77.3% vs 72.7%, p=0.73), confidence level on a 10-point scale (6.2 vs 6.2, p=1.0), or scan time (173 vs 199 seconds, p=0.28). Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents randomized to BP had a higher success rate on a transfer test, compared to RP when learning resuscitative TEE using a simulator. We consider this pilot work that can inform future studies in both simulation and real clinical settings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.