The hexose transporter family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae comprises 18 proteins (Hxt1^17, Gal2). Here, we demonstrate that all these proteins, except Hxt12, and additionally three members of the maltose transporter family (Agt1, Ydl247, Yjr160) are able to transport hexoses. In a yeast strain deleted for HXT1^17, GAL2, AGT1, YDL247w and YJR160c, glucose consumption and transport activity were completely abolished. However, as additional deletion of the glucose sensor gene SNF3 partially restored growth on hexoses, our data indicate the existence of even more proteins able to transport hexoses in yeast.z 1999 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, there are a large number of genes (HXTI -HXTl7/SNF3/RGT2) encoding putative hexose transporters which, together with a galactose permease gene (GAL2), belong to a superfamily of monosaccharide facilitator genes. We have performed a systematic analysis of the HXTl-7 and GAL2 genes and their function in hexose transport. Glucose uptake was below the detection level in the hxtl -7 null strain growing on maltose. Determination of the kinetic parameters of individual hexose transporter-related proteins (Hxtp) expressed in the hxt null background revealed Hxtlp and Hxt3p as low-affinity transporters (K,,,(g,uco,c, = 50-100 mM), Hxt2p and Hxt4p as moderately low in affinity 1-2 mM). However, Hxt2p kinetics in cells grown on low glucose concentrations showed a high-affinity (K,,, = 1.5 mM) and a low-affinity component ( K , = 60 mM). Furthermore, we investigated the involvement of glucose transport in glucose signalling. Glucose repression of MAL2, SUC2 and GAL1 was not dependent on a specific transporter but, instead, the strength of the repression signal was dependent on the level of expression, the properties of the individual transporters and the kind of sugar transported. The strength of the glucose repression signal correlated with the glucose consumption rates in the different strains, indicating that glucose transport limits the provision of a triggering signal rather then being directly involved in the triggering mechanism.

All known D-xylose transporters are competitively inhibited by D-glucose, which is one of the major reasons hampering simultaneous fermentation of D-glucose and D-xylose, two primary sugars present in lignocellulosic biomass. We have set up a yeast growthbased screening system for mutant D-xylose transporters that are insensitive to the presence of D-glucose. All of the identified variants had a mutation at either a conserved asparagine residue in transmembrane helix 8 or a threonine residue in transmembrane helix 5. According to a homology model of the yeast hexose transporter Gal2 deduced from the crystal structure of the D-xylose transporter XylE from Escherichia coli, both residues are found in the same region of the protein and are positioned slightly to the extracellular side of the central sugar-binding pocket. Therefore, it is likely that alterations sterically prevent D-glucose but not D-xylose from entering the pocket. In contrast, changing amino acids that are supposed to directly interact with the C6 hydroxymethyl group of D-glucose negatively affected transport of both D-glucose and D-xylose. Determination of kinetic properties of the mutant transporters revealed that Gal2-N376F had the highest affinity for D-xylose, along with a moderate transport velocity, and had completely lost the ability to transport hexoses. These transporter versions should prove valuable for glucose-xylose cofermentation in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other biotechnologically relevant organisms. Moreover, our data contribute to the mechanistic understanding of sugar transport because the decisive role of the conserved asparagine residue for determining sugar specificity has not been recognized before.xylose transport | major facilitator superfamily | transporter engineering | pentose metabolism | HXT

The SSY1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a member of a large family of amino acid permeases. Compared to the 17 other proteins of this family, however, Ssy1p displays unusual structural features reminiscent of those distinguishing the Snf3p and Rgt2p glucose sensors from the other proteins of the sugar transporter family. We show here that SSY1 is required for transcriptional induction, in response to multiple amino acids, of the AGP1 gene encoding a low-affinity, broad-specificity amino acid permease. Total noninduction of the AGP1 gene in the ssy1⌬ mutant is not due to impaired incorporation of inducing amino acids. Conversely, AGP1 is strongly induced by tryptophan in a mutant strain largely deficient in tryptophan uptake, but it remains unexpressed in a mutant that accumulates high levels of tryptophan endogenously. Induction of AGP1 requires Uga35p(Dal81p/DurLp), a transcription factor of the Cys 6 -Zn 2 family previously shown to participate in several nitrogen induction pathways. Induction of AGP1 by amino acids also requires Grr1p, the F-box protein of the SCF Grr1 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex also required for transduction of the glucose signal generated by the Snf3p and Rgt2p glucose sensors. Systematic analysis of amino acid permease genes showed that Ssy1p is involved in transcriptional induction of at least five genes in addition to AGP1. Our results show that the amino acid permease homologue Ssy1p is a sensor of external amino acids, coupling availability of amino acids to transcriptional events. The essential role of Grr1p in this amino acid signaling pathway lends further support to the hypothesis that this protein participates in integrating nutrient availability with the cell cycle.

Organization of proteins into complexes is crucial for many cellular functions. However, most proteomic approaches primarily detect protein interactions for soluble proteins but are less suitable for membrane-associated complexes. Here we describe a matingbased split ubiquitin system (mbSUS) for systematic identification of interactions between membrane proteins as well as between membrane and soluble proteins. mbSUS allows in vivo cloning of PCR products into a vector set, detection of interactions via mating, regulated expression of baits, and improved selection of interacting proteins. Cloning is simplified by introduction of attachment sites for GATEWAY. Homo-and heteromeric interactions between Arabidopsis K ؉ channels KAT1, AKT1, and AKT2 were identified.Tests with deletion mutants demonstrate that the C terminus of KAT1 and AKT1 is necessary for physical assembly of complexes. Screening of a sorted collection of 84 plant proteins with K ؉ channels as bait revealed differences in oligomerization between KAT1, AKT1, and AtKC1, and allowed detection of putative interacting partners of KAT1 and AtKC1. These results show that mbSUS is suited for systematic analysis of membrane protein interactions.split ubiquitin ͉ proteomics ͉ KAT1 ͉ Arabidopsis ͉ GATEWAY

BackgroundThe production of bioethanol from lignocellulose hydrolysates requires a robust, D-xylose-fermenting and inhibitor-tolerant microorganism as catalyst. The purpose of the present work was to develop such a strain from a prime industrial yeast strain, Ethanol Red, used for bioethanol production.ResultsAn expression cassette containing 13 genes including Clostridium phytofermentans XylA, encoding D-xylose isomerase (XI), and enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway was inserted in two copies in the genome of Ethanol Red. Subsequent EMS mutagenesis, genome shuffling and selection in D-xylose-enriched lignocellulose hydrolysate, followed by multiple rounds of evolutionary engineering in complex medium with D-xylose, gradually established efficient D-xylose fermentation. The best-performing strain, GS1.11-26, showed a maximum specific D-xylose consumption rate of 1.1 g/g DW/h in synthetic medium, with complete attenuation of 35 g/L D-xylose in about 17 h. In separate hydrolysis and fermentation of lignocellulose hydrolysates of Arundo donax (giant reed), spruce and a wheat straw/hay mixture, the maximum specific D-xylose consumption rate was 0.36, 0.23 and 1.1 g/g DW inoculum/h, and the final ethanol titer was 4.2, 3.9 and 5.8% (v/v), respectively. In simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Arundo hydrolysate, GS1.11-26 produced 32% more ethanol than the parent strain Ethanol Red, due to efficient D-xylose utilization. The high D-xylose fermentation capacity was stable after extended growth in glucose. Cell extracts of strain GS1.11-26 displayed 17-fold higher XI activity compared to the parent strain, but overexpression of XI alone was not enough to establish D-xylose fermentation. The high D-xylose consumption rate was due to synergistic interaction between the high XI activity and one or more mutations in the genome. The GS1.11-26 had a partial respiratory defect causing a reduced aerobic growth rate.ConclusionsAn industrial yeast strain for bioethanol production with lignocellulose hydrolysates has been developed in the genetic background of a strain widely used for commercial bioethanol production. The strain uses glucose and D-xylose with high consumption rates and partial cofermentation in various lignocellulose hydrolysates with very high ethanol yield. The GS1.11-26 strain shows highly promising potential for further development of an all-round robust yeast strain for efficient fermentation of various lignocellulose hydrolysates.

Transport across the plasma membrane is the first, obligatory step of hexose utilization. In yeast cells the uptake of hexoses is mediated by a large family of related transporter proteins. In baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the genes of 20 different hexose transporter-related proteins have been identified. Six of these transmembrane proteins mediate the metabolically relevant uptake of glucose, fructose and mannose for growth, two others catalyze the transport of only small amounts of these sugars, one protein is a galactose transporter but also able to transport glucose, two transporters act as glucose sensors, two others are involved in the pleiotropic drug resistance process, and the functions of the remaining hexose transporter-related proteins are not yet known. The catabolic hexose transporters exhibit different affinities for their substrates, and expression of their corresponding genes is controlled by the glucose sensors according to the availability of carbon sources. In contrast, milk yeast Kluyveromyces lactis contains only a few different hexose transporters. Genes of other monosaccharide transporter-related proteins have been found in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and in the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. However, the molecular genetics of hexose transport in many other yeasts remains to be established. The further characterization of this multigene family of hexose transporters should help to elucidate the role of transport in yeast sugar metabolism.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, glucose activation of cAMP synthesis requires both the presence of the G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) system, Gpr1‐Gpa2, and uptake and phosphorylation of the sugar. In a hxt‐null strain that lacks all physiologically important glucose carriers, glucose transport as well as glucose‐induced cAMP signalling can be restored by constitutive expression of the galactose permease. Hence, the glucose transporters do not seem to have a regulatory function but are only required for glucose uptake. We established a system in which the GPCR‐dependent glucose‐sensing process is separated from the glucose phosphorylation process. It is based on the specific transport and hydrolysis of maltose providing intracellular glucose in the absence of glucose transport. Preaddition of a low concentration (0.7 mM) of maltose to derepressed hxt‐null cells and subsequent addition of glucose restored the glucose‐induced cAMP signalling, although there was no glucose uptake. Addition of a low concentration of maltose itself does not increase the cAMP level but enhances Glu6P and apparently fulfils the intracellular glucose phosphorylation requirement for activation of the cAMP pathway by extracellular glucose. This system enabled us to analyse the affinity and specificity of the GPCR system for fermentable sugars. Gpr1 displayed a very low affinity for glucose (apparent Ka = 75 mM) and responded specifically to extracellular α and βd‐glucose and sucrose, but not to fructose, mannose or any glucose analogues tested. The presence of the constitutively active Gpa2val132 allele in a wild‐type strain bypassed the requirement for Gpr1 and increased the low cAMP signal induced by fructose and by low glucose up to the same intensity as the high glucose signal. Therefore, the low cAMP increases observed with fructose and low glucose in wild‐type cells result only from the low sensitivity of the Gpr1‐Gpa2 system and not from the intracellular sugar kinase‐dependent process. In conclusion, we have shown that the two essential requirements for glucose‐induced activation of cAMP synthesis can be fulfilled separately: an extracellular glucose detection process dependent on Gpr1 and an intracellular sugar‐sensing process requiring the hexose kinases.