BackgroundBox trainer systems have been developed that include advanced skills such as suturing. There is still a need for a portable, cheap training and testing system for basic laparoscopic techniques that can be used across different specialties before performing supervised surgery on patients. The aim of this study was to establish validity evidence for the Training and Assessment of Basic Laparoscopic Techniques (TABLT) test, a tablet‐based training system.MethodsLaparoscopic surgeons and trainees were recruited from departments of general surgery, gynaecology and urology. Participants included novice, intermediate and experienced surgeons. All participants performed the TABLT test. Performance scores were calculated based on time taken and errors made. Evidence of validity was explored using a contemporary framework of validity.ResultsSome 60 individuals participated. The TABLT was shown to be reliable, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0·99 (P < 0·001). ANOVA showed a difference between the groups with different level of experience (P < 0·001). The Bonferroni correction was used to confirm this finding. A Pearson's r value of 0·73 (P < 0·001) signified a good positive correlation between the level of laparoscopic experience and performance score. A reasonable pass–fail standard was established using contrasting groups methods.Conclusion TABLT can be used for the assessment of basic laparoscopic skills and can help novice surgical trainees in different specialties gain basic laparoscopic competencies.

When participants practised at home, they took an individualised approach to training. They mixed their training at home with training at the simulation centre. Participants practised at the beginning and towards the end of the course. Self-rating helped to guide unsupervised training where feedback was not accessible. Curricular requirements and testing determined when and how much participants practised.

Methods of instructional design vary widely in off-site training of laparoscopic skills. Implementation can be facilitated by organizing courses and training curricula following sound education theories such as proficiency-based learning and deliberate practice. Directed self-regulated learning has the potential to improve off-site laparoscopic skills training; however, further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of this type of instructional design.

Introduction: Simulation training at home improves access to training, but motivation can be difficult to maintain. Dyad training could keep trainees motivated. This study aimed to examine the effect of self-regulated training of basic surgical skills in pairs versus individually. Methods: One hundred one medical doctors were included in this prospective, mixedmethod, simulation-based study. Participants were randomized to train individually or in pairs during a 6-week course in open surgical skills, consisting of didactic instructions and self-directed training at home. Trainees kept a training log and filled in a questionnaire. Skills were tested before and after the course. Tests were rated by an expert using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global Rating Scale.Results: Ninety-seven doctors completed the study. We found no differences in test score between dyad and individual trainees. Dyad trainees compared with individual trainees improved by 7.23 points (intercept estimate) versus 6.94 points, respectively (P = 0.881). Dyad trainees trained less frequently [7.3 times (intercept estimate) vs. 12.1 times, P < 0.001, but for longer intervals compared with individual trainees (68 minutes vs. 38 minutes)]. Dyad trainees reported benefits such as having a sparring partner, receiving feedback, corrections, increased motivation, having fun, and more structured training sessions. However, the coordination of training sessions was difficult. Conclusions: No differences were found between dyad trainees and individual trainees in improvement of surgical skills. Off-site dyad training led to fewer, but longer training sessions, which may have negatively impacted the effectiveness of training. Dyad trainees perceived dyad training beneficial.