We report the results of the Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study, a blinded trial at 56 North American centers that compared the effects of ticlopidine hydrochloride (500 mg daily) with those of aspirin (1300 mg daily) on the risk of stroke or death. The medications were randomly assigned to 3069 patients with recent transient or mild persistent focal cerebral or retinal ischemia. Follow-up lasted for two to six years. The three-year event rate for nonfatal stroke or death from any cause was 17 percent for ticlopidine and 19 percent for aspirin--a 12 percent risk reduction (95 percent confidence interval, -2 to 26 percent) with ticlopidine (P = 0.048 for cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimates). The rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke at three years were 10 percent for ticlopidine and 13 percent for aspirin--a 21 percent risk reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 38 percent) with ticlopidine (P = 0.024 for cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimates). Ticlopidine was more effective than aspirin in both sexes. The adverse effects of aspirin included diarrhea (10 percent), rash (5.5 percent), peptic ulceration (3 percent), gastritis (2 percent), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1 percent). With ticlopidine, diarrhea (20 percent), skin rash (14 percent), and severe but reversible neutropenia (less than 1 percent) were noted. The mean increase in total cholesterol level was 9 percent with ticlopidine and 2 percent with aspirin (P less than 0.01). The ratios of high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein to total cholesterol were similar in both treatment groups. We conclude that ticlopidine was somewhat more effective than aspirin in preventing strokes in this population, although the risks of side effects were greater.
No abstract
The use of ROC analysis and available outcome data can improve the performance of CDUS in selecting endarterectomy candidates for cerebral angiography.
Secondary prevention of stroke and other manifestations of atherothrombosis is essential if the burden of disease associated with these events is to be reduced. Therefore, it is important to identify patients most likely to benefit from antiplatelet therapy. There is a good rationale for combining antiplatelet agents with different modes of action, since different signalling pathways contribute to platelet activation. Based on the promising results obtained with an adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist-aspirin combination in coronary stenting, several additional trials with clopidogrel plus aspirin are ongoing. They include CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events, in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction) and COMMIT (in acute myocardial infarction), which compare clopidogrel with placebo in patients receiving aspirin, and CREDO (Clopidogrel for Reduction of Events During extended Observation), a 1-year treatment follow-up to the clopidogrel arms of the CLASSICS trial (Clopidogrel Aspirin Stent International Cooperative Study). Planned trials with clopidogrel in neurology include SPS3 (Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes, in patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke), and MATCH (Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk patients, in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack plus one additional risk factor), which will compare the efficacy of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus clopidogrel in reducing important ischaemic events. Combination therapy with an oral glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist plus aspirin has so far been less promising. Trials of three compounds – orbofiban, xemilofiban and sibrafiban – in combination with aspirin for secondary prevention in cardiac patients have reported increased mortality compared with aspirin alone. A similar effect was seen when sibrafiban monotherapy was compared directly with aspirin alone. Trials of newer oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under way or are planned. The combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin appears to be superior to aspirin alone for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack; the effectiveness of this combination is being further investigated in ESPRIT (European/Australian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial).
Aspirin's benefit in preventing vascular outcomes is well established. It reduces the relative risk for stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death by about 25% compared with placebo. Almost 10 years ago we learned that ticlopidine is more effective than aspirin (about 12% relative risk reduction for stroke or death). However, ticlopidine has important adverse effects. In 1996, the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial showed that clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine similar to ticlopidine, is also more effective than aspirin (by a similar amount) and is as safe as aspirin. Also in 1996, the European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (ESPS-2) showed that dipyridamole alone prevents stroke and that when combined with aspirin it is more effective, probably comparable to ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Dipyridamole combined with aspirin reduced the relative risk for stroke or death by about 13% compared with aspirin alone. Both clopidogrel and dipyridamole are safe but will cost more than aspirin. Aspirin also appears beneficial for acute stroke treatment. The Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CAST) and the International Stroke Trial (IST) demonstrated that aspirin given at the time of an acute ischemic stroke reduces the risk for early death (about 5 less/1,000 treated), recurrence or death (about 10 less/1,000 treated), and dependence (about 5 less/1,000 treated). Overall, the benefits of aspirin in acute stroke treatment and stroke prevention are definite but modest. Combination therapy with antiplatelet agents that act through different mechanisms is a promising way to maximize the benefits of antiplatelet treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.