Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) grown at two locations in Alabama from 1966 to 1968 produced maximum yields when kept free of annual weeds for approximately 8 weeks after emergence. Weed control for longer periods failed to increase yields. When initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergence at one location and 4 to 5 weeks at the other location, cotton was not injured. Prolonged weed competition past the critical periods usually resulted in drastic cotton yield reductions. Plant height and stem diameter of cotton were reduced by some of the weed competition treatments.
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) was grown at two locations in Alabama during 1966 to 1969 with specific densities of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifoliaL.) and tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpureaL. Roth). Competition from sicklepod and tall morningglory caused cotton yield reductions at densities as low as eight weeds per 7.31 m of row. Tall morningglory was usually more competitive than sicklepod in cotton. Both species were more competitive on Lucedale sandy clay loam than on Norfolk sandy loam. Sicklepod at eight weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced yields from 10 to 23% on the Norfolk soil and approximately 40% on the Lucedale soil. At the highest density, 48 sicklepod plants per 7.31 m of row, yields were reduced 45 to 65% on the Norfolk soil and approximately 80% on the Lucedale soil. Tall morningglory at a density of eight weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields 10 to 40% on the Norfolk soil and 50 to 75% on the Lucedale soil. Vegetative growth, boll, and seed size were not affected as much as cotton yields by competition. Percentage lint and lint fiber properties were unaffected by competition.
Competitive effects of cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicumWallr.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexusL.) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) were evaluated in four experiments at two locations in Alabama during the period 1966 to 1968. Cocklebur was more competitive with cotton than was pigweed on Norfolk sandy loam soil. A density of eight cocklebur plants per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields 20 to 40%. Higher densities of cocklebur resulted in greater yield reductions. Forty-eight cocklebur plants per 7.31 m of row caused cotton yields to be reduced more than 80%. Pigweed at a density of 48 weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields less than 50% on the Norfolk soil. On Lucedale sandy clay loam, cocklebur and pigweed were equally competitive and both species were more competitive than on Norfolk soil. A density of eight cocklebur or pigweed plants per 7.31 m of row resulted in 60 to 70% cotton yield reductions. The highest density of pigweed studied, 48 plants per 7.31 m of row, reduced cotton yields 90% on the Lucedale soil. Vegetative growth, boll, and seed size were not affected as much as cotton yields by either weed species. Percentage lint and fiber properties were unaffected by plant competition.
Amitrole (3-amino-s-triazole), dichlormate (3,4-dichlorobenzyl methylcarbamate), and pyriclor (2,3,5-trichloro-
Absorption and translocation of the sodium salt of radioactive (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D-2-14C) by wolftail (Carex cherokeensis Schwein) plants grown from rhizomes were enhanced by high relative humidity but were not affected by dimethyl sulfoxide (hereinafter referred to as DMSO). Greatest accumulation of 2,4-D-2-14C translocated from the treated leaf occurred, in the meristematic tissue. DMSO increased the herbicidal activity of the triethanolamine salt of 2,4-D alone, but 2,4-D plus DMSO was no more effective than 2,4-D plus X-77. When both DMSO and X-77 were added to the 2,4-D solution, the treatments were no more effective than when either additive alone was included.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.