A venographic technique has been described which demonstrates the soleal veins in addition to the rest of the deep veins of the lower limb consistently in the presence or absence of thrombosis. In 127 consecutive patients, the soleal veins were demonstrated in all but three. In 97 surgical and medical patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis, the presence of thrombi was confirmed by venography only in 51 (52 per cent); the remainder had normal deep veins. In nine patients the soleal veins were the only site of thrombosis. Only one patient was found with thrombosis proximally and normal soleal veins. In the remaining patients whenever there were thrombi proximally they were also present in the soleal and intervening veins. It is concluded that in the majority of patients thrombi start in the soleal veins in the calf. It has also been shown that the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis is unreliable and no patient should be given anticoagulant therapy without first confirming the diagnosis with venography.
The most effective electrical stimulus to the calf muscles which prevents stasis in the soleal veins during operation was determined. This was subsequently used in a clinical trial and was shown to produce a 92% relative reduction in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis as determined by the (125)I-fibrinogen test.
Purpose: Sore throat is a frequent reason for seeking medical care but few prescription options are available. Lozenges are effective in delivering active ingredients to the throat. This study was conducted to determine the analgesic efficacy of two lozenges one containing amylmetacresol (AMC)/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (DCBA) and lidocaine and one containing hexylresorcinol versus placebo in patients with acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Methods: This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. In total, 190 patients were randomised 1:1:1 to a single dose of AMC/DCBA + lidocaine, hexylresorcinol or placebo lozenge. Subjective ratings of throat soreness, difficulty swallowing, swollen throat, numbing, and sore throat relief were obtained up to 2 hours post dose. Patient and investigator global ratings and a consumer questionnaire were also collected. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in severity of throat soreness for both lozenges versus placebo at 2 hours post dose. Results: The hexylresorcinol lozenge demonstrated superiority over placebo for primary and secondary efficacy variables including those related to throat soreness, sore throat relief and difficulty swallowing; the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge was also superior to placebo for secondary endpoints at various time points but did not reach significance for the primary efficacy variable. Both lozenges had a rapid onset of action from 1–10 minutes post dose for the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge and 1–5 minutes post dose for the hexylresorcinol lozenge. Numbness was reported from 1 minute post dose with the AMC/DCBA + lidocaine lozenge and was greatest at 15 minutes. Numbness was reported from 5 minutes post dose with the hexylresorcinol lozenge and was greatest at 10 minutes. Both lozenges were well tolerated. Conclusions: Both AMC/DCBA + lidocaine and hexylresorcinol lozenges provided rapid and effective sore throat relief in patients with URTI.
This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.
A venographic technique for studying stasis in the deep veins of the legs of conscious patients is described. A second technique involving the clearance of radioactive material from the veins has been developed for use during operation. The results of the two methods correlate closely.
There is considerable stasis of the blood, particularly in the soleal veins, in conscious patients with the legs horizontal, and it is prolonged considerably during surgery. Using these new techniques the effectiveness of various methods said to prevent stasis has been assessed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.