Identifying options for the sustainable intensification of cropping systems in southern Africa under prevailing high climate risk is needed. With this in mind, we tested an intercropping system that combined the staple crop maize with lablab, a local but underutilised legume. Grain and biomass productivity was determined for four variants (i) sole maize (sole-maize), (ii) sole lablab (sole-lablab), (iii) maize/lablab with both crops sown simultaneously (intercropped-SP) and (iv) maize/lablab with lablab sown 28 days after the maize crop (intercropped-DP). Soil water and weather data were monitored and evaluated. The trial was conducted for two seasons (2015/2016 and 2016/2017) at two sites in the Limpopo Province, South Africa: Univen (847 mm rainfall, 29.2 °C maximum and 18.9 °C minimum temperature average for the cropping season over the years 2008–2017) and Syferkuil (491 mm rainfall, with 27.0 °C maximum and 14.8 °C minimum temperature). Analysis revealed three key results: The treatment with intercropped-SP had significantly lower maize yields (2320 kg ha−1) compared with maize in intercropped-DP (2865 kg ha−1) or sole-maize (2623 kg ha−1). As expected, maize yields in the El Niño affected in season 2015/2016 were on average 1688 kg ha−1 lower than in 2016/2017. Maize yields were significantly lower (957 kg ha−1) at Univen, the warmer site with higher rainfall, than at Syferkuil. In 2015/2016, maximum temperature at Univen exceeded 40 °C around anthesis. Furthermore, soil water was close to the estimated permanent wilting point (PWP) for most of the cropping season, which indicates possible water limitations. In Syferkuil, the soil water was maintained well above PWP. Lablab yields were low, around 500 ha−1, but stable as they were not affected by treatment across season and site. Overall, the study demonstrated that intercropped-DP appears to use available soil water more efficiently than sole maize. Intercropped-DP could therefore be considered as an option for sustainable intensification under high climate risk and resource-limited conditions for smallholders in southern Africa.

This study quantifies the effect of fertilizer and irrigation management on water use efficiency (WUE), crop growth and crop yield in sub-humid to semi-arid conditions of Limpopo Province, South Africa. An approach of coupling a cropping system model (DSSAT) with an agro-hydrological model (SWAT) was developed and applied to simulate crop yield at the field and catchment scale. Simulation results indicated that the application of fertilizer has a greater positive effect on maize yield than irrigation. WUE ranged from 0.10–0.57 kg/m3 (rainfed) to 0.84–1.39 kg/m3 (irrigated) and was positively correlated with fertilizer application rate. The combined application of the variants with deficit irrigation and fertilizer rate (120:60 kg N:P/ha) for maize turned out to be the best option, giving the highest WUE and increasing average yield by up to 5.7 t/ha compared to no fertilization and rainfed cultivation (1.3 t/ha). The simulated results at the catchment scale showed the considerable spatial variability of maize yield across agricultural fields with different soils, slopes and climate conditions. The average annual simulated maize yield across the catchment corresponding to the highest WUE ranged from 4.0 to 7.0 t/ha. The yield gaps ranged from 3.0 to 6.0 t/ha under deficit irrigation combined with 120N:60P kg/ha and ranged from 0.2 to 1.5 t/ha when only applying deficit irrigation but no fertilizer. This information can support regional decision makers to find appropriate interventions that aim at improving crop yield and WUE for catchments/regions.