Proppant flowback following a hydraulic fracture treatment, is a major problem in the Northern Mexico area. Frequently, Proppant flows back as the well returns to production. Generating huge amount of cost associated with wellbore cleanouts and damage to surface facilities. In addition, production is delayed due to long shut-in times and the need to initially produce the well under choke. Therefore, been able to control proppant flowback at fracture closure would not only eliminate the extra expenses associated with it, but would allow to return the well back to production immediately with optimized chokes. In other words, an optimized proppant free robusted production. This paper presents successful applications of stabilizing proppant packs with randomly oriented fibers of similar density to the proppant in dry gas reservoirs with low permeabilities (<0.5 md). All wells were put on production immediately following fracture treatment, with an average of almost 2 fold production increase over resin-coated proppant treatments, having a case with up to 12 folds of increase. During "clean-up" of the wells, return fluids were collected for evaluation confirming expected proppant control and fluid compatibility between fracturing gels and breakers. Finally, production performance months after the treatments are discussed including conclusions and recommendations derived from treatments. Introduction Proppant flowback has been of concern in hydraulic fracturing for more than 20 years. It has received increased attention in recent years as larger fracture widths and use of higher proppant concentrations have become more prominent. A crucial part of many successful hydraulic treatments is preventing the newly placed proppant from being dislodged by produced fluids flowing back into the wellbore. One common practice for controlling such flowback is to coat the proppant with resin, then allow the resin to cure, thereby holding the proppant in place, before the flow is initiated. Curable resin-coated proppants (RCP) are used as all or the last part (tail-in) of the proppant in the fracture. The resin coating cures to form a strong proppant pack under conditions of sufficient closure stress, shut-in, time, and temperature. Curable RCPs control proppant flowback in many cases, but have several disadvantages. They are known to interact with the fluid chemistry (pH crosslinkers, breakers, etc.), can reduce fracture conductivity, and may be prone to failure under cycling loading conditions. In addition, RCPs need specific temperature, shut in time and stress conditions to form a strong bond. At lower temperatures (<150 F) chemical activators must be added to promote cure. An alternative to curable resin-coated proppant is using fibers. Fibers reinforce the proppant pack by forming a net-like structure to hold the proppant in place and allow fluids to flow. The advantage of this method is that it is a physical mechanism without complicating chemical curing reactions. No combination of temperature, pressure or shut in time is needed to stabilize the proppant pack, allowing more flexibility of flowback procedures to maximize well production and reduce costs. P. 201
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.