In a series of 1304 patients (1867 knees), the results of simultaneous and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty were compared with each other and with unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The bilateral procedures had a significantly higher rate of complications than unilateral procedures, almost entirely because of thromboembolic problems. However, this did not correspond to an increase in mortality. If a bilateral procedure was indicated, then a simultaneous procedure had no increased risk over a staged procedure. There was no increase in cardiovascular complications, the rate of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism or mortality. The rate of infection was lower with a bilateral procedure and the overall revision rate was less than 1% in all groups. The prosthesis functioned as well in all groups in the medium and longer term periods. We feel that simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty is a safe and successful procedure when compared with a staged bilateral procedure. It also has the added benefit of single anaesthetic, reduced costs and decreased total recovery time when compared to a staged bilateral procedure. For these reasons it should be considered as an option in the presence of bilateral knee joint disease.

At 13 years, BTB ACL reconstruction provides a good outcome. Chondral and meniscal damage at surgery were associated with a poor radiological outcome, indicating that injuries sustained during ACL rupture may be the main predictors of degenerative bone disease.

No abstract

We have carried out a prospective study comparing the results at five years in patients older than 75 years of age undergoing hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement (TKR) with those who were younger. The Knee Society clinical rating scores were recorded before and after operation. Of 559 patients undergoing TKR, 135 were in the elderly age group. The knee scores at five years or more showed comparable results, with patients under 75 years of age reaching a score of 183 and those aged 75 years or over reaching 174. These differences were predominantly due to the functional component of the score. We conclude that elderly patients do just as well as the younger group using this prosthesis.

No abstract