No abstract

No abstract

Background: High Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have consistently been reported with 2‐week dual therapy regimens of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin. Ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics may provide an alternative 1‐week eradication regimen. Methods: This double‐blind, randomized, parallel group, international, multicentre study compared ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (RC) with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. for 1 week (RCM) for eradication of H. pylori in 350 patients with dyspepsia. Results: Treatment with RC and RCM eradicated H. pylori (established by the combination of two negative results from two discrete 13C‐UBTs at nominal weeks 4 and 12) from 89% (95% CI: 84–94) and 92% (95% CI: 88–97) of the observed population, and from 78% (95% CI: 72–84) and 80% (95% CI: 75–86) of the intention‐to‐treat population. When established only by one negative 13C‐UBT result at least 28 days after the end of treatment, the respective intention‐to‐treat rates were 85% (95% CI; 79–90) and 88% (95% CI: 83–93). Both regimens were well‐tolerated, only 6% of patients given RC and 4% given RCM discontinued treatment. Median plasma bismuth concentrations at the end of the second week of study were low, at 3.5 and 0.4 ng/mL, respectively. Conclusions: Ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy for 1 week (RCM) and dual therapy for 2 weeks (RC) were equally effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

Background Ileus is common after elective colorectal surgery, and is associated with increased adverse events and prolonged hospital stay. The aim was to assess the role of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for reducing ileus after surgery. Methods A prospective multicentre cohort study was delivered by an international, student‐ and trainee‐led collaborative group. Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between January and April 2018 were included. The primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal recovery, measured using a composite measure of bowel function and tolerance to oral intake. The impact of NSAIDs was explored using Cox regression analyses, including the results of a centre‐specific survey of compliance to enhanced recovery principles. Secondary safety outcomes included anastomotic leak rate and acute kidney injury. Results A total of 4164 patients were included, with a median age of 68 (i.q.r. 57–75) years (54·9 per cent men). Some 1153 (27·7 per cent) received NSAIDs on postoperative days 1–3, of whom 1061 (92·0 per cent) received non‐selective cyclo‐oxygenase inhibitors. After adjustment for baseline differences, the mean time to gastrointestinal recovery did not differ significantly between patients who received NSAIDs and those who did not (4·6 versus 4·8 days; hazard ratio 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 0·96 to 1·12; P = 0·360). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leak rate (5·4 versus 4·6 per cent; P = 0·349) or acute kidney injury (14·3 versus 13·8 per cent; P = 0·666) between the groups. Significantly fewer patients receiving NSAIDs required strong opioid analgesia (35·3 versus 56·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Conclusion NSAIDs did not reduce the time for gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery, but they were safe and associated with reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

Summary.