Immune checkpoint inhibitors1 result in impressive clinical responses2–5 but optimal results will require combination with each other6 and other therapies. This raises fundamental questions about mechanisms of non-redundancy and resistance. Here, we report major tumor regressions in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with an anti-CTLA4 antibody (anti-CTLA4) and radiation (RT) and reproduced this effect in mouse models. Although combined treatment improved responses in irradiated and unirradiated tumors, resistance was common. Unbiased analyses of mice revealed that resistance was due to upregulation of PD-L1 on melanoma cells and associated with T cell exhaustion. Accordingly, optimal response in melanoma and other cancer types requires RT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD-L1/PD-1. Anti-CTLA4 predominantly inhibits T regulatory cells (Tregs) to increase the CD8 T cell to Treg (CD8/Treg) ratio. RT enhances the diversity of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of intratumoral T cells. Together, anti-CTLA4 promotes expansion of T cells, while RT shapes the TCR repertoire of the expanded peripheral clones. Addition of PD-L1 blockade reverses T cell exhaustion to mitigate depression in the CD8/Treg ratio and further encourages oligo-clonal T cell expansion. Similar to results from mice, patients on our clinical trial with melanoma showing high PD-L1 did not respond to RT + anti-CTLA4, demonstrated persistent T cell exhaustion, and rapidly progressed. Thus, PD-L1 on melanoma cells allows tumors to escape anti-CTLA4-based therapy, and the combination of RT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD-L1 promotes response and immunity through distinct mechanisms.

Tolerance to self-antigens prevents the elimination of cancer by the immune system1,2. We used synthetic chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) to overcome immunological tolerance and mediate tumor rejection in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Remission was induced in a subset of subjects, but most did not respond. Comprehensive assessment of patient-derived CAR T cells to identify mechanisms of therapeutic success and failure has not been explored. We performed genomic, phenotypic and functional evaluations to identify determinants of response. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that CAR T cells from complete-responding patients with CLL were enriched in memory-related genes, including IL-6/STAT3 signatures, whereas T cells from nonresponders upregulated programs involved in effector differentiation, glycolysis, exhaustion and apoptosis. Sustained remission was associated with an elevated frequency of CD27+CD45RO- CD8+ T cells before CAR T cell generation, and these lymphocytes possessed memory-like characteristics. Highly functional CAR T cells from patients produced STAT3-related cytokines, and serum IL-6 correlated with CAR T cell expansion. IL-6/STAT3 blockade diminished CAR T cell proliferation. Furthermore, a mechanistically relevant population of CD27+PD-1CD8+ CAR T cells expressing high levels of the IL-6 receptor predicts therapeutic response and is responsible for tumor control. These findings uncover new features of CAR T cell biology and underscore the potential of using pretreatment biomarkers of response to advance immunotherapies.

SUMMARY Exhausted CD8+ T cells (TEX) in chronic infections and cancer have limited effector function, high inhibitory receptor co-expression and extensive transcriptional changes compared to effector (TEFF) or memory (TMEM) CD8+ T cells. TEX are important clinical targets of checkpoint blockade and other immunotherapies. Epigenetically, TEX are a distinct immune subset, with a unique chromatin landscape compared to TEFF and TMEM. However, the mechanisms governing the transcriptional and epigenetic development of TEX remain unknown. Here, we identify the HMG-box transcription factor TOX as a central regulator of TEX. TOX is largely dispensable for TEFF and TMEM formation, but is critical for exhaustion and without TOX TEX do not form. TOX is induced by calcineurin and NFAT2 and operates in a feed-forward loop to become calcineurin independent and sustained in TEX. Thus, robust TOX expression results in commitment to TEX by translating persistent stimulation into a distinct TEX transcriptional and epigenetic developmental program.

Blocking Programmed Death–1 (PD-1) can reinvigorate exhausted CD8 Tcells (TEX) and improve control of chronic infections and cancer. However, whether blocking PD-1 can reprogram TEX into durable memory Tcells (TMEM) is unclear. We found that reinvigoration of TEX in mice by PD-L1 blockade caused minimal memory development. After blockade, reinvigorated TEX became reexhausted if antigen concentration remained high and failed to become TMEM upon antigen clearance. TEX acquired an epigenetic profile distinct from that of effector Tcells (TEFF) and TMEM cells that was minimally remodeled after PD-L1 blockade. This finding suggests that TEX are a distinct lineage of CD8 Tcells. Nevertheless, PD-1 pathway blockade resulted in transcriptional rewiring and reengagement of effector circuitry in the TEX epigenetic landscape. These data indicate that epigenetic fate inflexibility may limit current immunotherapies.

Inhibitors of the PD-1:PD-L1 pathway, a central regulator of T cell exhaustion, have been recently shown to be effective for treatment of different cancers. However, clinical responses are mixed, highlighting the need to better understand the mechanisms of action of PD-1:PD-L1, the role of this pathway in immunity to different tumors, and the molecular and cellular effects of PD-1 blockade. Here we review the molecular regulation of T cell exhaustion, placing recent findings on PD-1 blockade therapies in cancer in the context of the broader understanding of the roles of the PD-1:PD-L1 pathway in T cell exhaustion during chronic infection. We discuss the current understanding of the mechanisms involved in reversal T cell exhaustion, and outline critical areas of focus for future research, both basic and clinical.

Viruses that cause chronic infection constitute a stable but little-recognized part of our metagenome: our virome. Ongoing immune responses hold these chronic viruses at bay while avoiding immunopathologic damage to persistently infected tissues. The immunologic imprint generated by these responses to our virome defines the normal immune system. The resulting dynamic but metastable equilibrium between the virome and the host can be dangerous, benign, or even symbiotic. These concepts require that we reformulate how we assign etiologies for diseases, especially those with a chronic inflammatory component, as well as how we design and interpret genome-wide association studies, and how we vaccinate to limit or control our virome.

The contributors Christian U. Blank is a medical oncologist and principal investigator at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. He is Professor of Haematology/oncology at the university of Regensburg, Germany, and received an MBA degree from the university of Warwick, UK. His research interests include neoadjuvant immunotherapies, targeted and biological response modifiers, and prognostic markers for cancer immunotherapies. W. Nicholas Haining is a physician-scientist and vice-President for Discovery oncology and Immunology at Merck Research Laboratories. His former academic laboratory at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Broad Institute focused on understanding the transcriptional control of T cell exhaustion and on identifying regulators of the immune response to cancer in tumour and immune cells. Werner Held's laboratory has a long-standing interest in understanding the development, differentiation and function of natural killer cells and CD8 + T cells. Current work focuses on CD8 + T cell differentiation in response to acute and chronic infections as well as cancer. Patrick G. Hogan's research centres on mechanisms and regulation of cellular calcium signalling, the biology of the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) family of transcription factors and the transcriptional control of immune cell development and function. Axel Kallies is a professor at the University of Melbourne, Australia. His laboratory studies the molecular control of CD8 + cytotoxic T cell and regulatory T cell differentiation with a focus on populations residing in non-lymphoid tissue, including healthy tissues and tumours. The Kallies laboratory has developed and applied genetic and molecular approaches to this field, including novel gene reporters, metabolic techniques, transcriptional profiling, chromatin immunoprecipitation and accessible chromatin sequencing. Enrico Lugli's laboratory is focused on understanding the biological mechanisms at the basis of memory T cell responses and homeostasis in humans and how this information can be exploited to favour antitumour immune responses in patients with cancer. The group is specialized in single-cell technologies, in particular high-dimensional flow cytometry. Rachel C. Lynn is an associate director of research at Lyell Immunopharma. She received her PhD degree from the the university of Pennsylvania, where she developed multiple preclinical chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy platforms. During her postdoctoral work with Crystal mackall at Stanford university, she developed models to interrogate and strategies to mitigate CAR T cell exhaustion. At Lyell Immunopharma, her research group will continue to investigate optimal strategies for adoptive T cell therapy in cancer.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Community-level immunity, acquired through infection or vaccination, is necessary to control the pandemic as the virus continues to circulate (1). mRNA vaccines encoding a stabilized version of the full-length SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein have been widely administered and clinical trial data demonstrated up to 95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 (2, 3). These mRNA vaccines induce potent humoral immune responses, with neutralizing antibody titers proposed as the major correlate of protection (4-6). Current evidence suggests that circulating antibodies persist for at least 6 months post-vaccination (7), though there is some decay from peak levels achieved after the second dose. This decline from peak antibody levels may be associated with an increase in infections over time compared to the initial months post-vaccination (8, 9). Yet, vaccine-induced immunity remains highly effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death even at later timepoints when antibody levels may decline (10)(11)(12).Previous research has largely focused on responses early in the course of vaccination, with transcriptional analysis identifying potential links between myeloid cell responses and neutralizing antibodies (13).