[1] Retrieval uncertainty estimates for vertical tropospheric NO 2 columns based on theoretical error source discussions combined with actual Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) observations are presented. Contributions to the total retrieval uncertainty are divided into three categories: (1) errors caused by measurement noise and spectral fitting, affecting the slant column density, (2) errors related to the separation of stratospheric and tropospheric NO 2 affecting the estimate of the stratospheric slant column, and (3) errors due to uncertainty in model parameters such as clouds, surface albedo, and a priori profile shape, affecting the tropospheric air mass factor. Furthermore, it is shown that a correction for the effective temperature of the trace gas is essential and that a correction for the presence of aerosols needs to be accompanied by aerosol corrections to the cloud retrieval. A discussion of the error components and total retrieval uncertainty is given for March 1997. Tropospheric NO 2 columns can be retrieved with a precision of 35-60% over regions with a large contribution of the troposphere to the total column. This error estimate demonstrates the need for highly accurate albedo maps, cloud retrieval schemes, and realistic a priori NO 2 profile shapes.

Abstract. We present a new algorithm for the near-real time retrieval -within 3 h of the actual satellite measurement -of tropospheric NO 2 columns from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). The retrieval is based on the combined retrieval-assimilation-modelling approach developed at KNMI for off-line tropospheric NO 2 from the GOME and SCIAMACHY satellite instruments. We have adapted the off-line system such that the required a priori informationprofile shapes and stratospheric background NO 2 -is now immediately available upon arrival (within 80 min of observation) of the OMI NO 2 slant columns and cloud data at KNMI. Slant columns for NO 2 are retrieved using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) in the 405-465 nm range. Cloud fraction and cloud pressure are provided by a new cloud retrieval algorithm that uses the absorption of the O 2 -O 2 collision complex near 477 nm. Online availability of stratospheric slant columns and NO 2 profiles is achieved by running the TM4 chemistry transport model (CTM) forward in time based on forecast ECMWF meteo and assimilated NO 2 information from all previously observed orbits. OMI NO 2 slant columns, after correction for spurious across-track variability, show a random error for individual pixels of approximately 0.7×10 15

No abstract

[1] We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415-465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground-and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product's three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO 2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMI NO 2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO 2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km 2 ), while a ground-based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO 2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from <10 15 cm À2 over remote, rural areas to >10 16 cm À2 over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMI's areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO 2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground-based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO 2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8-0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground-based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO 2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15-30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO 2 and ground-based measurements are generally >0.6.

[1] In this paper we present validation results of the total ozone column data products of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board the NASA EOS-AURA satellite through comparisons with ground-based observations by Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometer instruments. Quality-controlled and archived total ozone column data from these ground-based instruments located at stations worldwide have been used to validate more than 2 a of total ozone column observations from OMI. There are two operationally available satellite total ozone column data products, based on the OMI-TOMS and the OMI-DOAS retrieval algorithms, respectively. Validation with ground-based data focused on global comparisons and seasonal dependence and the possible dependence on latitude and solar zenith angle. Our results show a globally averaged agreement of better than 1% for OMI-TOMS data and better than 2% for OMI-DOAS data with the ground-based observations. The OMI-TOMS data product is shown to be of high overall quality with no significant dependence on solar zenith angle or latitude. The OMI-DOAS data product shows no significant dependence on latitude except for the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere where it systematically overestimates the total ozone value. In addition a significant dependence on solar zenith angle is found between OMI-DOAS and ground-based data. Comparisons of satellite and ground-based data tend to show a marginal seasonal dependence even though it remains unclear whether this dependence originates from the ground-based or spaceborne observations.

Environment (RIVM) NO 2 lidar. We show that NO 2 from Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) compares well with in situ measurements. We show that different MAX-DOAS instruments, operating simultaneously during the campaign, give very similar results. We also provide unique information on the spatial homogeneity and the vertical and temporal variability of NO 2 , showing that during a number of days, the NO 2 columns derived from measurements in different directions varied significantly, which implies that, under polluted conditions, measurements in one single azimuth direction are not always representative for the averaged field that the satellite observes. In addition, we show that there is good agreement between tropospheric NO 2 from OMI and MAX-DOAS, and also between total NO 2 from OMI and directsun observations. Observations of the aerosol optical thickness (AOT) show that values derived with three ground-based instruments correspond well with each other, and with aerosol optical thicknesses observed by OMI.

No abstract

[1] This paper is an overview of the validation of the total column ozone data products from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board the NASA EOS-Aura satellite. OMI is an imaging UV/visible spectrometer that maps global ozone on a daily basis. There are two ozone products from OMI, one derived using the traditional TOMS retrieval algorithm and another derived using a Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy algorithm that is being developed to take advantage of the hyperspectral capabilities of OMI. Validation is primarily performed through comparison with a network of Dobson and Brewer ground stations and secondarily through campaigns conducted specifically to validate Aura. Comparison with an ensemble of 76 Northern Hemisphere ground stations shows that OMI-TOMS total column ozone averages 0.4% higher than the station average, with station-to-station standard deviation of ±0.6%. The comparison shows that the OMI-TOMS ozone was stable over the 2-year period with no evidence of drift relative to the ground network. The OMI-DOAS product is also stable but with a 1.1% offset and a seasonal variation of ±2%. During four aircraft validation campaigns using the NASA DC-8 and WB-57 aircraft, ozone above the aircraft was measured using an actinic flux instrument and compared with OMI ozone. These comparisons showed agreement within 2% over a broad range of latitude and viewing conditions. Only during the high-latitude flights did the OMI-DOAS ozone show the effects of a solar zenith angle dependent error.