Otitis media with effusion (OME) is almost universal in children born with a cleft palate. Early placement of a ventilation tube to alleviate hearing problems is common. A retrospective study has been carried out to assess whether the practice of tube placement only for definite clinical indications is successful in terms of subsequent hearing levels and speech and language development. This was assessed by a case note review, analysis of speech therapy data and by means of a special follow-up clinic.There was no difference in speech development between those treated with tube insertion for OME and those untreated. Audiological thresholds were worse in the treated group. A similar number in each group required regular speech therapy. More abnormal otological findings were present at follow up in those who had tubes inserted, some of these were directly attributable to the presence of tubes.A conservative management of OME in cleft palate children, with tube insertion for only definite clinical indications, is an appropriate management, and will lead to fewer otological complications of tube insertion.

Objective To compare growth, speech, and nasal symmetry outcomes of three methods of hard palate repair. Patients Consecutive available records of children born with unilateral bony complete cleft lip and palate over the period 1972 to 1992. Interventions Identical management of lip, nose, alveolus, and soft palate. Hard palate repair by Cuthbert Veau (CV) from 1972 to 1981, von Langenbeck (vL) from 1982 to 1989, or medial Langenbeck (ML) from 1989 to 1991. Outcome Measures For growth: GOSLON yardstick or 5-year model index. For speech: articulation test. Nasal anemometry. For nasal symmetry: Coghlan computer-based assessment. All these measures were developed during the period of data collection but not for this project. Results There was a strong trend toward more favorable anteroposterior maxillary growth with the change from CV to vL to ML techniques. This fell short of statistical significance because of the small sample size. There was a significant reduction in cleft-related articulation faults (p = .01) considered to be related to improved arch form. In the absence of improved rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency or nasal symmetry, increased surgical experience was discounted as a significant contribution to improved growth and articulation outcomes. Conclusions Reduced periosteal undermining and residual exposed palatal shelf from CV to vL to ML improved incisor relationships and articulation.

No abstract

No abstract