Nerve conduction velocity distribution (CVD) study is a newly-developed electrodiagnostic method for detecting alterations in the composition of nerve fibres according to their conduction velocity. The presence of subclinical neuropathy was evaluated in 138 diabetic patients by CVD study of four motor nerves (external popliteal and ulnar nerves bilaterally) and two sensory nerves (median nerve bilaterally), and the data obtained were compared with standard electrophysiological parameters in the same nerve segments. CVD studies revealed an altered distribution pattern in 106 of 129 evaluable patients for motor nerves (82%) and in 67 of 115 evaluable patients for sensory nerves (58%), while standard examination gave abnormal findings in 92 of 137 patients (67%) and in 33 of 118 patients (11%), respectively. Of the patients adequately evaluated by both techniques, 21 of 129 patients (16%) revealed altered CVD data unaccompanied by slowing of maximum nerve conduction velocity, and 37 patients of 101 (37%) showed similar findings for sensory nerves. Subclinical alterations of motor and sensory nerve CVD were not significantly related to age or to metabolic control expressed as glycated haemoglobin levels; a significantly longer duration of disease was found in patients with motor and mixed subclinical neuropathy with respect to non-neuropathic patients. The CVD study allowed us to detect subclinical abnormalities of motor and sensory nerve fibres; often this is a more sensitive method than the standard electrodiagnostic study. This method can be very useful as a diagnostic tool and in research in the study of the progression of diabetic neuropathy.

The sympathetic skin response (SSR), evoked from the middle finger of both hands by electrical stimuli to the median nerve (MN) at the wrist, was studied in 21 patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and in 16 patients with monolateral CTS (14 at the right and 2 at the left side) without clinical signs of autonomic involvement. In monolateral and bilateral CTS there was a decrease in the SSR areas of both sides. In monolateral CTS the decrease was greater contralaterally to the lesion. A decrease in the SSR in CTS generally indicates a local blockade of sympathetic nerve excitability due to MN entrapment. Contralateral reduction of the sympathetic response suggests an involvement of the efferent pathway of the autonomic reflex far from the lesion at the wrist. However, dispersion of the excitement over a long distance and throughout numerous synaptic connections may affect contralateral more than homolateral SSR excitability. Finally, sympathetic damage in CTS is in accord with the anatomofunctional correlation (in the peripheral nerve and ganglia) between somatic sensory, which were most markedly involved in our patients, and sympathetic afferent nerve fibers.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract