Background: Given considerable evidence that routine episiotomy increases maternal morbidity and without evidence to support maternal or neonatal benefit, has episiotomy use changed among health care providers? To date, very limited information exists relating to the past and current practice of episiotomy in many developing countries. Results: There were 1877 episiotomies, for an episiotomy rate of 45%. Ninety per cent of the primigravid parturients had episiotomy. Women undergoing episiotomy were younger (mean age 24.7 years; range 16-37) than women without episiotomy (mean age 28.5 years, range 20-43). When controlled for parity and maternal age, other risk factors were occipito-posterior position, vacuum extraction, forceps delivery, vaginal breech delivery, and a history of Caesarean section. Episiotomy use was also associated with major perineal lacerations and increased length of hospital stay. Conclusion: The episiotomy rate of 45 per 100 vaginal deliveries in this study is obviously higher than evidence-based recommendations for optimal patient care. A policy of systematic reduction in the incidence of episiotomy can be pursued in this hospital. Greater attention needs to be paid to selection of women to undergo episiotomy.

Conclusion:The study showed a positive correlation between lack of proper antenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcome with poorer outcomes in unbooked than booked patients. Improving the availability and accessibility of quality antenatal and delivery care services in our environment will improve pregnancy outcome.

No abstract

No abstract