Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of external audit quality in reducing firm misreporting practices.
Design/methodology/approach
Data are gathered from a number of sources including the Osiris database and firms’ annual reports to construct a comprehensive data set containing financial and non-financial information of over 3,100 publicly listed firms in China during the period 2009–2017. A number of rigorous empirical specifications are utilized with the use of probit, logit and conditional logit regressions, as well as panel pooled OLS and fixed-effect estimators. The IV-2SLS, 2-step system GMM and difference-in-differences techniques are also employed to deal with the potential endogeneity bias to ensure the robustness of the empirical results.
Findings
The empirical results reveal that larger firms and firms having more tangible assets and greater retained earnings are more likely to employ a better-quality external auditor. Subsequently, higher audit quality leads to a deterioration in corporate misreporting. However, these results are not homogenous across firms. While we document similar findings in the case of non-state-owned firms, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) appear to have less tendency to hire a higher-quality auditor, and higher-quality auditors in turn do not play a significant role in reducing misreporting practices in SOEs.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to a better understanding of the mechanism to mitigate corporate misreporting practices. It is one of the few to empirically investigate auditor selections and the association between external audit quality and corporate misreporting practices in China.
This paper examines the causes and behavior of price volatility in the US crude oil market. Although crude oil prices are among the most volatile, they have received limited academic scrutiny heretofore. This study shows that (1) the crude oil market is characterized by volatility persistence, (2) a negative shock has more impact on future volatility than an equal positive shock, (3) crude oil volatility is lower at higher prices, (4) OPEC meeting announcements and the Petroleum Status Report releases cause increased volatility, and (5) there is a day-of-the-week pattern in this market. I develop and employ an improved procedure for testing and quantifying the hypothesized volatility determinants within GARCH type model.
This study explores how the institution of the host countries affects the natural resource-seeking and strategic asset-seeking motives of the Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Using the system GMM estimation method and data of the Chinese outward foreign direct investment during the period from 2003 to 2020, the study shows that the search for strategic assets by the Chinese outward foreign direct investment is directed toward the host countries with well-established institutions, while the search for natural resources is driven by poor institutions of the host countries. Findings from this study provide empirical evidence for policymakers to formulate appropriate foreign investment policies given the dynamics of Chinese foreign direct investment worldwide.
This paper examines the causes and behavior of price volatility in the US natural gas market. Although natural gas prices are among the most volatile, they have received limited academic scrutiny heretofore. The study’s main findings are: (1) the natural gas market is characterized by volatility persistence, (2) predicted volatility increases more following a positive shock than an equal negative shock, (3) there are day-of-the-week and month-of-the-year patterns in this market, (4) surprises in the change in natural gas in storage cause increased volatility, (5) volatility tends to be higher during and immediately after bid week, and (6) volatility tends to be higher on winter days when the temperature is lower than normal. The model developed and employed in this research is an improved procedure for testing and quantifying the hypothesized volatility determinants within a GARCH type model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.