BackgroundThyroid function in patients with Grave’s disease is usually evaluated by thyroid scintigraphy with radioactive iodine. Recently, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) with two different energy X-rays can calculate iodine concentrations and can be applied for iodine measurements in thyroid glands. This study aimed to assess the potential use of DECT for the functional assessment of the thyroid gland.MethodsThirteen patients with Grave’s disease treated at our hospital from May to September 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Before treatments, all subjects had undergone both iodine scintigraphy [three and 24 h after oral administration of 123I (20 μCi)] and non-enhanced DECT. The region of interests (ROIs) were placed in both lobes of the thyroid glands, and CT values (HU: Hounsfield unit) and iodine concentrations (mg/mL) calculated from DECT images were measured. The correlation between CT values and iodine concentrations from DECT in the thyroid gland was evaluated and then the iodine concentrations were compared with radioactive iodine uptake ratios by thyroid scintigraphy.ResultsMean (±SD) 123I uptake increased from 46.3 (±22.2) % (range, 11.1–80.1) at 3 h, to 66.5 (±15.2) % (range, 40.0–86.1) at 24 h (p < 0.01). CT values ranged from 34.5 to 98.7 HU [mean: 67.8 (±18.6)], while the iodine concentrations calculated with DECT ranged from 0.0 to 1.3 mg/mL [mean: 0.5 (±0.4)]. A moderate positive correlation between CT values and the calculated iodine concentrations in the thyroid gland was seen (R = 0.429, p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation between 123I uptake at 3 h and iodine concentration by DECT were seen (R = −0.680, p < 0.05), although no correlation was observed between 123I uptake at 3 h and CT values (p = 0.087). No correlation was observed between 123I uptake at 24 h and CT values (p = 0.153) or that between 123I uptake at 24 h and iodine concentration by DECT (p = 0.073).ConclusionThe negative correlation of 123I uptake at 3 h with iodine concentration evaluated by DECT was better than that observed with simple CT value. DECT may have a potential role in the evaluation of iodine turnover in hyperthyroid patients.
Abstract. The lack of isolation ward throughout Japan has long been limiting the 131 I radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) cases. The 30 mCi RAI ablation was only recently permitted for outpatient basis. However, no patient selection tool nor response predictor has been proposed. This study evaluated factors to find response predictor and determinant for the suitable patients. The retrospective study reviewed 47 eligible non-metastatic papillary DTC patients whose had first 30 mCi RAI ablation after total thyroidectomy. Age, gender, clinical stage, risk category, and preablation serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level were among covariates analyzed to determine the patient selection factors; while the thyroid bed uptake on initial whole body scan (WBS) was later also included in determining RAI ablation response. Thirteen (28%) patients had a low risk (T1-2) while 23 (49%) and 11 (23%) had an intermediate (T3) or high risk (T4), respectively. Twenty-five patients were responders, and 22 were non-responders. All factors were similar between responders and nonresponders except pre-ablation serum Tg level (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, pre-ablation serum Tg level was the only significant factor for both patient selection (odd ratio (OR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-2.06) and response predictor (OR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.12-1.95). With the cut-off of 5.4 ng/mL, pre-ablation serum Tg level predicts RAI ablation response with 92% specificity and 73% sensitivity. Pre-ablation serum Tg level may help patient selection and predict the response to outpatient 30 mCi RAI ablation among post total thyroidectomy non-metastatic DTC patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.