The SOFA score assessed at the onset of bacteremia is a reliable tool for predicting 14-day mortality in surgical patients with A baumannii bacteremia.
The phenotypically indistinguishable Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter nosocomialis have become leading pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. A. baumannii and A. nosocomialis nosocomial pneumonias were grouped as a single clinical entity previously. This study aimed to determine whether they are the same or a different clinical entity. A total of 121 patients with A. baumannii and 131 with A. nosocomialis bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia were included during an 8-year period. Despite the similar Charlson co-morbidity scores at admission, patients with A. baumannii pneumonia were more likely to have abnormal haematological findings, lobar pneumonia, significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and higher frequency of shock at the onset of bacteraemia than those with A. nosocomialis pneumoni. A. baumannii isolates were resistant to more classes of antimicrobials, except colistin, and therefore the patients with A. baumannii pneumonia were more likely to receive inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. The 14-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with A. baumannii pneumonia (34.7% vs. 15.3%, p 0.001). A. baumannii was an independent risk factor for mortality (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05-3.90; p 0.035) in the overall cohort after adjustment for other risk factors for death, including inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. The results demonstrated the difference in clinical presentation, microbial characteristics and outcomes between A. baumannii and A. nosocomialis nosocomial pneumonia, and supported that they are two distinct clinical entities.
Background:
Virtual reality (VR)-based simulation in hospital settings facilitates the acquisition of skills without compromising patient safety. Despite regular text-based training, a baseline survey of randomly selected healthcare providers revealed deficiencies in their
knowledge
,
confidence
,
comfort
, and care skills regarding tracheostomy. This prospective pre–post study compared the effectiveness of
regular
text- and VR-based
intervention
modules in training healthcare providers
’
self-efficacy in tracheostomy care skills.
Methods:
Between January 2018 and January 2020, 60 healthcare providers, including physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists, were enrolled. For the intervention, a newly developed head-mounted display (HMD) and web VR materials were implemented in training and clinical services. Subsequently, in-hospital healthcare providers were trained using either text or head-mounted display virtual reality (HMD-VR) materials in the
regular
and
intervention
modules, respectively. For tracheostomy care skills, preceptors directly audited the performance of trainees and provided feedback.
Results:
At baseline, the degree of trainees
’
agreement with the self-efficacy-related statements, including the aspects of
familiarity, confidence
, and
anxiety
about tracheostomy-related knowledge and care skills, were not different between the control and
intervention
groups. At follow-up stage, compared with the
regular
group, a higher percentage of
intervention
group
’
trainees reported that they are “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” that the HMD-VR simulation increases their self-efficacy, including the aspects of
familiarity
and
confidence
, and reduced their
anxiety
about tracheostomy-related knowledge and care skills. After implementation, a higher degree of trainees
’
average satisfaction with VR-based training and VR materials was observed in the
intervention
group than in the
regular
group. Most reported that VR materials enabled accurate messaging and decreased anxiety. The increasing trend of the average written test and hands-on tracheostomy care skills scores among the
intervention
group trainees was significant compared to those in the
regular
group. The benefits of HMD-VR simulations and web-VR material-based clinical services for in-hospital healthcare providers and patient families p...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.