Unmanned aircraft, or drones, are a rapidly emerging sector of the aviation industry. There has been limited substantive research, however, into the public perception and acceptance of drones. This article presents the results from two surveys of the Australian public designed to investigate (1) whether the public perceive drones to be riskier than existing manned aviation, (2) whether the terminology used to describe the technology influences public perception, and (3) what the broader concerns are that may influence public acceptance of the technology. We find that the Australian public currently hold a relatively neutral attitude toward drones. Respondents did not consider the technology to be overly unsafe, risky, beneficial, or threatening. Drones are largely viewed as being of comparable risk to that of existing manned aviation. Furthermore, terminology had a minimal effect on the perception of the risks or acceptability of the technology. The neutral response is likely due to a lack of knowledge about the technology, which was also identified as the most prevalent public concern as opposed to the risks associated with its use. Privacy, military use, and misuse (e.g., terrorism) were also significant public concerns. The results suggest that society is yet to form an opinion of drones. As public knowledge increases, the current position is likely to change. Industry communication and media coverage will likely influence the ultimate position adopted by the public, which can be difficult to change once established.

Abstract-Aerial photography obtained by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is a rising market for their civil application. Small UAVs are believed to close gaps in niche markets, such as acquiring airborne image data for remote sensing purposes. Small UAVs can fly at low altitudes, in dangerous environments, and over long periods of time. However, their small lightweight construction leads to new problems, such as higher agility and more susceptibility to turbulence, which has a big impact on the quality of the data and their suitability for aerial photography. This paper investigates the use of fish-eye lenses to overcome field-of-view (FOV) issues for highly agile UAV platforms susceptible to turbulence. The fish-eye lens has the benefit of a large observation area (large FOV) and does not add additional weight to the aircraft, such as traditional mechanical stabilizing systems. We present the implementation of a fish-eye lens for aerial photography and mapping purposes, with potential use in remote sensing applications. We describe a detailed investigation from the fish-eye lens distortion to the registering of the images. Results of the process are presented using low-quality sensors typically found on small UAVs. The system was flown on a midsize platform (a more stable Cessna aircraft) and also on ARCAA's small (< 10 kg) UAV platform. The effectiveness of the approach is compared for the two sized platforms.

No abstract

Our original “Telemicroscopy” project has now been expanded into a project in which we aim to provide a “Collaboratory for Microscopic Digital Anatomy” (CMDA) Tools being developed will provide a researcher at a remote site distributed interaction with unique instrumentation for data acquisition, as well as significantly enhanced capabilities to derive and analyze 3D data by accessing high performance computers. Initial focus is on the collection and analysis of data from a unique IVEM located at the National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research (NCMIR). The NCMIR instrument is one of a few IVEMs in the USA made available to the biological research community by the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health. This particular instrument was specially designed to obtain images from thick specimens containing substantial 3D structure. Because of the characteristics of the EM, images acquired represent two dimensional projections of the 3D structure within the specimen.

This paper presents an approach to derive requirements for an avionics architecture that provides onboard sense-and-avoid and autonomous emergency forced landing capabilities to a UAS. The approach is based on two design paradigms that (1) derive requirements analyzing the common functionality between these two functions to then derive requirements for sensors, computing capability, interfaces, etc.(2) consider the risk and safety mitigation associated with these functions to derive certification requirements for the system design. We propose to use the Aircraft Certification Matrix (ACM) approach to tailor the system Development Assurance Levels (DAL) and architecture requirements in accordance with acceptable risk criteria. This architecture is developed under the name "Flight Guardian". Flight Guardian is an avionics architecture that integrates common sensory elements that are essential components of any UAS that is required to be dependable. The Flight Guardian concept is also applicable to conventionally piloted aircraft, where it will serve to reduce cockpit workload.