Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the number one leading cause of death among women in Malawi. However, it is generally viewed as preventable and treatable if diagnosed in an early stage. Despite the burden, Malawi registers low uptake of cervical cancer screening (CCS). This study examined the socio-demographic determinants of CCS uptake among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi district. Methods A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in five health facilities. A total of 482 women between the ages of 18–49 participated and were sampled using a multi-stage sampling method. An interviewer administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data from June to July, 2019. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify determinants of CCS uptake among WCBA. Results Few respondents (13.1%) had ever done CCS. Compared to respondents in the age-group of 18–24 years, those in the age-groups of 25–35 years and 36–49 years were 2.63 and 3.90 times more likely to undergo CCS (AOR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.30–5.31 and AOR = 3.90, 95% CI 1.62–9.38), respectively. Respondents who practiced Christianity were 2.77 times more likely to undergo CCS than those who practiced Islam (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.23–6.22). Respondents of the Chewa ethnic group were 71% less likely to undergo CCS as compared to those of Yao ethnicity (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.95). Respondents who lived in semi-urban areas were 2.57 times more likely to go for CCS than those who were village residents (AOR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.19–5.55). Conclusion Our study showed that CCS uptake was low in Mangochi and the results suggested that age, religion, ethnicity and place of residence were determinants of CCS uptake. We recommend that comprehensive health education on CC should specifically target the young women and Muslim women in places where they meet. We call upon the district health authorities to scale up CCS provision in all Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) and outreach clinics to improve CCS uptake among women residing in the villages and those of the Chewa ethnicity. We, further, call upon all CC program implementers to design programs that address the highlighted socio-demographic determinants of CCS uptake among WCBA in the district.
Background Cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake remains low in poor countries. Few studies have assessed individual need and health system factors which facilitate/impede use of healthcare services, including CCS utilization. Thus, we examined associations between these factors and CCS utilization among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi, Malawi. Methods A cross-sectional study, sampling 482 women (18–49 years) using a multi-stage sampling method was conducted in five health facilities (HFs). Data were collected using a structured interview questionnaire from June-July, 2019. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the distribution of CCS utilization according to different independent groups. Results Our study found that 13.1% of the study participants had a history of CCS. The proportion of WCBA with a history of CCS was significantly higher among HIV + women than HIV- women and women with unknown HIV status, respectively [27.3% (33/121) vs. 8.5% (30/353) vs. 0% (0/8), χ2 = 29.18, df = 2, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who had ever heard of cervical cancer (CC) than those who had not [23.0% (60/261) vs. 1.4% (3/221), χ2 = 49.28, df = 1, p < 0.001], among those who heard of CC from HFs than those who heard through radios, friends/family and other sources, respectively [31.2% (44/141) vs. 16.7% (7/42) vs. 9.3% (5/54) vs. 16.7% (4/24), χ2 = 12.62, df = 3, p = 0.006], among those with positive beliefs towards CCS than those with negative beliefs [19.2% (53/276) vs. 4.9% (10/206), χ2 = 21.37, df = 1 p < 0.001], among those recommended for CCS by health workers (HWs) than those not recommended [19.6% (53/270) vs. 4.7% (10/212), χ2 = 23.24, df = 1, p < 0.001], among those willing to be screened by male HWs than those unwilling [14.4% (60/418) vs. 4.7% (3/64), χ2 = 4.57, df = 1, p = 0.033]. Fisher’s exact test showed that CCS uptake among WCBA varied significantly by level of knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, with 66.7% (12/18) and 19.8% (48/243) among those with high-level and low-level knowledge screened, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions HIV status, ever heard of CC, sources of information, knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, beliefs, recommendations by HWs for CCS, willingness to be screened by male HWs were associated with CCS utilization. Thus, sensitization campaigns for CCS should be conducted to increase uptake. Further, health facilities should intensify health education on CC, including signs and symptoms to increase knowledge. In addition, CC program implementers should be willing to train both males and females to offer CCS as the clients are open to be attended to by male providers as well.
Background Cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake remains low in poor countries. Limited studies have assessed individual need and health system factors which facilitate/impede use of healthcare services, including CCS uptake. Thus, we examined associations between these factors and CCS uptake among women of child-bearing age (WCBA) in Mangochi, Malawi. Methods A cross-sectional study, sampling 482 women (18–49 years) using a multi-stage sampling method was conducted in five health facilities (HFs). Data were collected from June-July, 2019. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the distribution of CCS uptake according to different independent groups. Results The proportion of WCBA who did CCS was significantly higher among HIV + women than those who were HIV- and with unknown HIV status, respectively [27.3% (33/121) vs 8.5% (30/353) vs 0% (0/8), χ2 = 29.18, df = 2, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who had ever heard of cervical cancer (CC) than those who had not [23.0% (60/261) vs 1.4% (3/221), χ2 = 49.28, df = 1, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those who heard of CC from HFs than those who heard through radios, friends/family and other sources, respectively [31.2% (44/141) vs 16.7% (7/42) vs 9.3% (5/54) vs 16.7% (4/24), χ2 = 12.62, df = 3, p = 0.006]. Significantly higher among those with positive beliefs towards CCS than those with negative beliefs [19.2% (53/276) vs 4.9% (10/206), χ2 = 21.37, df = 1 p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those recommended for CCS by health workers (HWs) than those not recommended [19.6% (53/270) vs 4.7% (10/212), χ2 = 23.24, df = 1, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher among those willing to be screened by male HWs than those unwilling [14.4% (60/418) vs 4.7% (3/64), χ2 = 4.57, df = 1, p = 0.033]. Fisher’s exact test showed that CCS uptake among WCBA varied significantly by level of knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, with 66.7% (12/18) and 19.8% (48/243) among those with high-level and low-level knowledge screened, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions HIV status, ever heard of CC, sources of information, knowledge of CC signs/symptoms, beliefs, recommendations by HWs for CCS, willingness to be screened by male HWs were associated with CCS uptake. These should be prioritized to improve CCS uptake among WCBA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.