Although emerging evidence has implicated structural/functional abnormalities of patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD), definitive neuroimaging markers remain obscured due to inconsistent or incompatible findings, especially for structural imaging. Furthermore, brain differences defined by statistical analysis are difficult to implement individual prediction. The present study has employed the machine learning techniques under the unified framework in neuroimaging to identify the neuroimaging markers of patients with ASD and distinguish them from typically developing controls(TDC). To enhance the interpretability of the machine learning model, the study has processed three levels of assessments including model-level assessment, feature-level assessment, and biology-level assessment. According to these three levels assessment, the study has identified neuroimaging markers of ASD including the opercular part of bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, the orbital part of right inferior frontal gyrus, right rolandic operculum, right olfactory cortex, right gyrus rectus, right insula, left inferior parietal gyrus, bilateral supramarginal gyrus, bilateral angular gyrus, bilateral superior temporal gyrus, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, and left inferior temporal gyrus. In addition, negative correlations between the communication skill score in the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS_G) and regional gray matter (GM) volume in the gyrus rectus, left middle temporal gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus have been detected. A significant negative correlation has been found between the communication skill score in ADOS_G and the orbital part of the left inferior frontal gyrus. A negative correlation between verbal skill score and right angular gyrus and a significant negative correlation between non-verbal communication skill and right angular gyrus have been found. These findings in the study have suggested the GM alteration of ASD and correlated with the clinical severity of ASD disease symptoms. The interpretable machine learning framework gives sight to the pathophysiological mechanism of ASD but can also be extended to other diseases.

Structural MRI (sMRI) has been widely used to examine the cerebral changes that occur in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, previous studies have aimed for brain changes at the group level rather than at the individual level. Additionally, previous studies have been inconsistent regarding the changes they identified. It is difficult to identify which brain regions are the true biomarkers of PD. To overcome these two issues, we employed four different feature selection methods [ReliefF, graph-theory, recursive feature elimination (RFE), and stability selection] to obtain a minimal set of relevant features and nonredundant features from gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). Then, a support vector machine (SVM) was utilized to learn decision models from selected features. Based on machine learning technique, this study has not only extended group level statistical analysis with identifying group difference to individual level with predicting patients with PD from healthy controls (HCs), but also identified most informative brain regions with feature selection methods. Furthermore, we conducted horizontal and vertical analyses to investigate the stability of the identified brain regions. On the one hand, we compared the brain changes found by different feature selection methods and considered these brain regions found by feature selection methods commonly as the potential biomarkers related to PD. On the other hand, we compared these brain changes with previous findings reported by conventional statistical analysis to evaluate their stability. Our experiments have demonstrated that the proposed machine learning techniques achieve satisfactory and robust classification performance. The highest classification performance was 92.24% (specificity), 92.42% (sensitivity), 89.58% (accuracy), and 89.77% (AUC) for GM and 71.93% (specificity), 74.87% (sensitivity), 71.18% (accuracy), and 71.82% (AUC) for WM. Moreover, most brain regions identified by machine learning were consistent with previous findings, which means that these brain regions are related to the pathological brain changes characteristic of PD and can be regarded as potential biomarkers of PD. Besides, we also found the brain abnormality of superior frontal gyrus (dorsolateral, SFGdor) and lingual gyrus (LING), which have been confirmed in other studies of PD. This further demonstrates that machine learning models are beneficial for clinicians as a decision support system in diagnosing PD.

Background Since both essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) are movement disorders and share similar clinical symptoms, it is very difficult to recognize the differences in the presentation, course, and treatment of ET and PD, which leads to misdiagnosed commonly. Purpose Although neuroimaging biomarker of ET and PD has been investigated based on statistical analysis, it is unable to assist the clinical diagnosis of ET and PD and ensure the efficiency of these biomarkers. The aim of the study was to identify the neuroimaging biomarkers of ET and PD based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Moreover, the study also distinguished ET from PD via these biomarkers to validate their classification performance. Methods This study has developed and implemented a three-level machine learning framework to identify and distinguish ET and PD. First of all, at the model-level assessment, the searchlight-based machine learning method has been used to identify the group differences of patients (ET/PD) with normal controls (NCs). And then, at the feature-level assessment, the stability of group differences has been tested based on structural brain atlas separately using the permutation test to identify the robust neuroimaging biomarkers. Furthermore, the identified biomarkers of ET and PD have been applied to classify ET from PD based on machine learning techniques. Finally, the identified biomarkers have been compared with the previous findings of the biology-level assessment. Results According to the biomarkers identified by machine learning, this study has found widespread alterations of gray matter (GM) for ET and large overlap between ET and PD and achieved superior classification performance (PCA + SVM, accuracy = 100%). Conclusions This study has demonstrated the significance of a machine learning framework to identify and distinguish ET and PD. Future studies using a large data set are needed to confirm the potential clinical application of machine learning techniques to discern between PD and ET.

Variety of facial pose and expression will affect result of face recognition. Traditional methods analyze facial pose and expression through every pixel of image, on the contrary, the paper analyzes pose and expression through geometric relationship among images. The paper uses locally linear embedding (LLE) which computes low dimensional, neighborhood preserving embedding of high dimensional data. The algorithm not only finds the nonlinear structure of data effectively, but also is invariable to translation and revolution. The experimentation shows that the algorithm can reflect slight variety of facial pose and expression, and indicates that low dimensional distribution of various pose and expression is identical to different persons and original image can be reconstructed exactly from neighboring images.