Nucleus accumbens receives a dense dopaminergic innervation which is important in regulating motivated states of behavior such as goal- directed actions, stimulus-reward associations and reinforcement of addictive substances. The shell and core territories of this nucleus each receive functionally and morphologically distinct dopaminergic inputs and lesions of the ascending pathways totally deprive the core but not the shell of dopaminergic fibers. Medium spiny neurons are the principal targets of dopaminergic terminals. The present study explored whether the loss of dopamine inputs can affect these neurons and whether cells in the shell and core would be equally susceptible to such a loss. Intracellular injection in fixed slices and neuronal reconstruction were used to analyze the dendritic trees of 62 neurons in the shell and core of animals that received a unilateral, chronic 6- hydroxydopamine lesion of the medial forebrain bundle. In the dopamine- depleted core, dendrites are significantly shorter (16% decrease) than in the intact core and in both the dopamine-depleted core and lateral shell, dendrites are less spiny than in respective control regions. Dopamine loss in the medial shell is associated with significantly more tortuous dendrites that are lower in spine density. However, the number of spines is not reduced which may mean that the increase recorded for segment length, although insignificant in tests, could be responsible for the change in spine density. These data suggest that the loss of dopamine can affect accumbal neuronal morphology and, moreover, can affect neuronal structures differentially in the shell and core.
Prior studies indicate that the central projections of noninfraorbital vibrissae occupy greater than normal transverse areas in the rat trigeminal brainstem complex after infraorbital nerve section at birth. Here, we assessed the development of this phenomenon and possible underlying mechanisms. Cytochrome oxidase patches representing spared supraorbital (SO) or posteroorbital (PO) whiskers in the trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris (SpVi) were not reliably larger than those on the control side 24 hr after the infraorbital lesion. By 72 hr, SO and PO patches were 91% and 28% larger than those on the control side. Reliable increases were also observed on postnatal day 5 (PND5), PND7, and PND10 for the SO (59%, 65%, 66%) and PO (23%, 44%, 51%) patches. To test the hypothesis that central reorganization reflects the maintenance of peripheral supernumerary axons, myelinated and unmyelinated axons in SO vibrissa follicles were counted at PND0, PND7, PND17, and PND60. A corollary hypothesis, that peripheral regeneration errors result in both SO and surviving infraorbital axons, contributing to central SO patches, was tested with retrograde double-labeling methods. Both hypotheses were rejected. Thus, enlargement of SO patches is not due to either the maintenance of an immature peripheral innervation pattern, or regeneration of infraorbital axons into SO follicles. To determine if the enlargement of SO and PO patches produced by infraorbital nerve section is due to an activity-dependent competitive disadvantage imposed upon infraorbital afferents, TTX or bupivicaine was applied to the intact infraorbital nerve over the first 5-9 postnatal days. Brainstem maps developed normally and SO and PO patch areas were unaffected. Thus, impulse activity-based mechanisms do not appear to contribute to injury-induced patch enlargement. To test the hypothesis that patch enlargement is due to central collateral reorganization, intra-axonal recording and staining methods were applied to control and spared-whisker primary afferents in adult rats. Total bouton or collateral numbers did not differ in SpVi; however, arbor areas were reliably larger in experimental (14,879 +/- 350 microns 2) versus control (5527 +/- 1811 microns 2) fibers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.