IntroductionCommon variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common primary immunodeficiency in adults. 1 Recurrent bacterial infections of the respiratory tract are the clinical hallmark present in nearly all patients. 2 In addition, up to 40% of the patients show gastrointestinal disease, concomitant lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune phenomena, or granulomatous inflammation. 2 The pathogenic understanding of antibody deficiency in humans has always been hampered by the great heterogeneity of the syndrome. 3 In 1966, Rosen and Janeway started to group antibody deficiencies by their mode of inheritance. 4 In 1973, Cooper included the clinical course and serum immunoglobulin levels, thereby separating hyper-IgM syndromes and selective IgA deficiency. 5 The remaining group of still very heterogeneous antibody deficiencies was termed CVID. Consecutive attempts to subclassify CVID by B-cell function in vitro 6,7 failed to reach diagnostic acceptance because of laborious and poorly standardized procedures and a lack of clinical relevance.In 2002, we and others suggested a flow cytometric classification of CVID according to the B-cell phenotype. 8,9 The abnormalities of circulating B cells in patients with CVID had already been recognized earlier, 10 but only with the ease and the broad availability of flow cytometry was a widespread and systematic analysis of these aberrations possible. The Freiburg classification divided patients into 3 groups by analyzing the expression of IgM, IgD, CD27 and CD21. 8 Group 1 was characterized by a severe reduction of switched memory B cells (IgD Ϫ IgM Ϫ CD27 ϩ less than 0.4% of lymphocytes), while group 2 representing 25% of the analyzed CVID patients exhibited nearly normal numbers of class-switched memory B cells, suggesting a post germinal center defect. The online version of this article contains a data supplement.The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. Methods PatientsAll patients were diagnosed as having CVID based on the European Society for Immunodeficiencies/Pan-American Group for Immunodeficiency (ESID/PAGID) criteria, 11 including a marked decrease of IgG (at least 2 standard deviations [SDs] below the mean for age) and a marked decrease in at least one of the isotypes IgM or IgA, the onset of clinical significant immunodeficiency at greater than 2 years of age, and the exclusion of defined causes of hypogammaglobulinemia (see also www.esid.org). Not all patients have been evaluated for absent isohemagglutinins and/or poor response to vaccines. For the final evaluation of B-cell phenotyping, the following exclusion criteria were adopted: patients younger than 6 years of age at the time of flowcytometric evaluation, patients on immunosuppressive treatment, patients suffering currently from malignancies, and patients with less than 1% peripheral B cells. Altogether, 303 patients of origi...

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common symptomatic primary immunodeficiency. It can present at any age in patients with a history of recurrent bacterial infections, with or without a family history of other primary immunodeficiencies (PID), and shows a wide range of clinical manifestations and immunological data. Diagnosis is based on low IgG, IgM and/or IgA levels. Delayed diagnosis and therapy can lead to bronchiectasis and malabsorption. The aim of this study was to describe a paediatric population diagnosed of CVID and its evolution in the population. Memory B-cell (MB) classification carried out in these patients was correlated with clinical manifestations and outcome. Clinical and immunological data of 22 CVID children under 18 yr treated at our centre between 1985 and 2005 are presented. Immunological studies included those for diagnosis and MB quantification. Differences in form of presentation, familial incidence and MB classification were reviewed. A statistical descriptive analysis was made. Infections were the commonest manifestation, affecting mainly respiratory (19/22) and gastrointestinal (10/22) tracts. Bronchiectasis was present in seven cases, and detected prior to CVID diagnosis in five. Replacement therapy led to a significant reduction in the number of infections. Severe complications appeared mostly in patients without MB. Patients of the same family share the same MB group. Family members had also been diagnosed of CVID in seven cases. Early diagnosis and therapy are essential to improve outcome in these patients. MB studies are useful in children to orient prognosis and further genetic studies.

The aim of this study was to determine if the measurement of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (abeta2-GPI) in serum levels contributes to the better characterization of the clinical situation of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). For this purpose abeta2-GPI of both isotypes was measured in 42 patients with APS and 32 SLE patients without APS. Clinical records of all patients were thoroughly reviewed. The presence of abeta2-GPI was correlated with the clinical manifestations of APS and compared with the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity. There was a positive correlation between levels of aCL and abeta2-GPI for both IgG and IgM isotypes (rho of Spearman=0.82 and 0. 64 respectively, P=0.0001). Both antibodies presented significantly higher titres in LA positive patients (P<0.05). The specificity for APS was 91% for IgG abeta2-GPI vs 75% for IgG aCL and 87% for IgM abeta2-GPI vs 81% for IgM aCL. 68% of patients with thrombosis of 100% of patients with thrombocytopenia showed positive tests for all three markers (aCL, LA, abeta2-GPI). Simultaneous presence of circulating LA and high titres of both aCL and abeta2-GPI identify a subset of patients with primary APS (PAPS) who have a more severe clinical course of the disease. Although the specificity of abeta2-GPI IgG is higher than that of aCL IgG, when all three tests are performed abeta2-GPI testing provides only additional information to that of aCL and LA. Therefore, we concluded that the abeta2-GPI test should not be considered as a substitute for conventional LA or aCL assays. However, performance of abeta2-GPI seems to be important in PAPS with high aCL titres, to alert the physician about the risk for the worst course of the illness.

No abstract

No abstract