The three chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.) cultivars viz. chilli DARL 210, Chilli Long Black and Sartoria were grown in middle hill climatic conditions of western Himalayas at an altitude of 5,500 feet above the sea level. The variation in total capsaicinoids (Capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin) was studied from budding to full maturity stage of fruits. The fruits were harvested at every fifteen days interval from flower budding (stage zero) to full maturity stage (stage seven). The total capsaicinoids were evaluated with the help of HPLC. It can be concluded from the study that, to achieve maximum pungency (total capsaicinoids) in these cultivars, the chilli cv. DARL 210 should be harvested at the stage of full maturity (after 105 days). Whereas, Chilli long black should be harvested after 75 days and cultivar Sartoria in between 60 to 90 days from flower budding stage. As far as pungency among these cultivars is concerned DARL 210 was the most pungent followed by Chilli Long black, while Sartoria was found least pungent cultivar.
Cow has been regarded as the most important sacred animal since Vedic ages having very high value in country's religion, history and with deep impact on economy, spirituality, social strata and Yogic traditions. In Rig-Veda, Cow is sometimes said to be as Indra's mother which highlights its importance. The cow, now a days, are being into focus for their possible role in supporting the sustainable organic economy through their main and allied products. The cow products have been an essential portion in Indian Yogic traditions since time immemorial and we can often see them being used in daily worship rituals in the Indian households. The Yogic perspective of economic importance of cow helps us to see and strengthen their contemporary importance in modern scenario.
Introduction: Distal tibial fractures remain one of the most substantial therapeutic challenges for the orthopedic traumatology. Despite the advances that have been made in management, these fractures can be challenging to deal with, especially when associated with significant soft-tissue injury. Treatment of pilon fractures ranges from non operative to various operative options. Among operative, two most controversial methods include Staged procedure using open reduction internal fixation and via using primary hybrid fixator.Objective: This study aims to compare the outcomes of tibial pilon fracture treatment with staged open reduction and internal fixation with LCP and primary hybrid fixation and evaluate its results. Material & Methods: This Prospective Randomized comparative study was done in a tertiary level health care center. The patients were included in the study after fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were then randomized in either of the two groups and treated accordingly by single orthopaedic surgeon to avoid the bias. Follow up was done after 3 week and then reviewed every one month up to 6 month. At 6 month IOWA score was asseseed. Fracture union was assessed on the basis of clinical and radiographic criteria. Clinically the ability to fully weight bear with no pain at the fracture was considered to represent clinical union. Results: According to IOWA ankle score 32% in group A and 40% in group B had excellent result, 40% in group A and 52% in group B had good result, 20% in group A and 8% in group B had fair result and 8% had poor result in group A due to deep infections (osteomylitis) in bone. Mean IOWA Ankle Score at the Final follow up in Group A was 82.64±10.27 and of Group B was 86.96±5.07, which was nonsignificant. In terms of functional results, excellent result was observed in 8 patients in Group A and 10 in Group B. Conclusion:The management of pilon fracture with both of them procedure were equally effective but aims was to reduce surgical tissue trauma, deep infection and preservation of periosteal vascular integrity and osteogenic fracture haematoma all cause early union, which was much more possible by hybrid fixator group.
Submission of an original paper with copyright agreement and authorship responsibility. I (corresponding author) certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.Thanking you.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.