Aims Contemporary data describing type 2 diabetes prevalence, incidence and mortality are limited. We aimed to (i) estimate annual incidence and prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes in the UK between 2004 and 2014; (ii) examine relationships between observed rates with age, gender, socio-economic status and geographic region; and (iii) assess how temporal changes in incidence and all-cause mortality rates influence changes in prevalence.Methods Type 2 diabetes cases aged ≥16 years between January 2004 and December 2014 were identified using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Up to five individuals without diabetes were matched to diabetes cases based on age, gender and general practice. Annual incidence, prevalence and mortality rates were calculated per 10,000 person-years at risk (95% CI). Survival models compared the mortality rates in patients with and patients without type 2 diabetes.Results Prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes increased from 3. 21% (3.19; 3.22) in 2004 to 5.26% (5.24; 5.29) in 2014. Incidence rates remained overall stable throughout the study period. Higher incidence and prevalence rates were related to male gender and deprivation. People with type 2 diabetes were associated with higher risk for mortality (Hazard ratio 1.26 [1.20; 1.32]. Mortality rates declined in patients with and without diabetes throughout the study period. The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in patients aged 16-34years increased over time. ConclusionsThe rising UK prevalence of type 2 diabetes over the last decade is likely to be explained by patients living longer rather than increasing type 2 diabetes incidence.3
Background Little is known about the epidemiology of medication errors and medication-related harm following transition from secondary to primary care. This systematic review aims to identify and critically evaluate the available evidence on the prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm following hospital discharge. Methods Studies published between January 1990 and March 2019 were searched across ten electronic databases and the grey literature. No restrictions were applied with publication language or patient population studied. Studies were included if they contained data concerning the rate of medication errors, unintentional medication discrepancies, or adverse drug events. Two authors independently extracted study data. Results Fifty-four studies were included, most of which were rated as moderate (39/54) or high (7/54) quality. For adult patients, the median rate of medication errors and unintentional medication discrepancies following discharge was 53% [interquartile range 33-60.5] (n = 5 studies) and 50% [interquartile range 39-76] (n = 11), respectively. Five studies reported adverse drug reaction rates with a median of 27% [interquartile range 18-40.5] and seven studies reported adverse drug event rates with a median of 19% [interquartile range 16-24]. For paediatric patients, one study reported a medication error rate of 66.3% and another an adverse drug event rate of 9%. Almost a quarter of studies (13/54, 24%) utilised a follow-up period post-discharge of 1 month (range 2-180 days). Drug classes most commonly implicated with adverse drug events were antibiotics, antidiabetics, analgesics and cardiovascular drugs. Conclusions This is the first systematic review to explore the prevalence and nature of medication errors and adverse drug events following hospital discharge. Targets for future work have been identified.
These population-based U.K. amputation data are similar to amputation rates in the U.S. Amputation rates appear to have decreased significantly since 1980-1982. The impact of diabetes education and prevention programs that target the processes leading to amputation can now be evaluated.
b Bacteria belonging to the normal colonic microbiota are associated with the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Although several mucosal species have been implicated in the disease process, the organisms and mechanisms involved are unknown. The aim of this investigation was to characterize mucosal biofilm communities over time and to determine the relationship of these bacteria to patient age and disease severity and duration. Multiple rectal biopsy specimens were taken from 33 patients with active UC over a period of 1 year. Real-time PCR was used to quantify mucosal bacteria in UC patients compared to 18 noninflammatory bowel disease controls, and the relationship between indicators of disease severity and bacterial colonization was evaluated by linear regression analysis. Significant differences were detected in bacterial populations on the UC mucosa and in the control group, which varied over the study period. High clinical activity indices (CAI) and sigmoidoscopy scores (SS) were associated with enterobacteria, desulfovibrios, type E Clostridium perfringens, and Enterococcus faecalis, whereas the reverse was true for Clostridium butyricum, Ruminococcus albus, and Eubacterium rectale. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium numbers were linked with low CAI. Only E. rectale and Clostridium clostridioforme had a high age dependence. These findings demonstrated that longitudinal variations in mucosal bacterial populations occur in UC and that bacterial community structure is related to disease severity.
Adherence and persistence with respiratory therapies in the UK is relatively low. There is suggestion that patients with COPD may display more adherent behaviours than patients with asthma.
Objective To look for evidence of a relation between antibiotic resistance and prescribing by general practitioners by analysis of prescribing at both practice and individual patient level. Design Repeated cross-sectional study in 1995 and 1996. Setting 28 general practices in the Ninewells Hospital laboratory catchment area, Tayside, Scotland. Subjects reviewed 8833 patients registered with the 28 practices who submitted urine samples for analysis. Main outcome measures Resistance to trimethoprim in bacteria isolated from urine samples at practice and individual level simultaneously in a multilevel model. Results Practices showed considerable variation in both the prevalence of trimethoprim resistance (26-50% of bacteria isolated) and trimethoprim prescribing (67-357 prescriptions per 100 practice patients). Although variation in prescribing showed no association with resistance at the practice level after adjustment for other factors (P = 0.101), in the multilevel model resistance to trimethoprim was significantly associated with age, sex, and individual-level exposure to trimethoprim (P < 0.001) or to other antibiotics (P = 0.002). The association with trimethoprim resistance was strongest for people recently exposed to trimethoprim, and there was no association for people with trimethoprim exposure more than six months before the date of the urine sample. Discussion Analysis of practice level data obscured important associations between antibiotic prescribing and resistance. The results support efforts to reduce unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics in the community and show the added value of individual patient data for research on the outcomes of prescribing.
Objective A service evaluation project was conducted to design a pharmaceutical assessment screening tool (PAST) to assign all inpatients a patient acuity level (PAL) to then help teams of clinical pharmacists prioritise the frequency of, and the seniority of, pharmacists performing patient reviews; assess clinical pharmacists' adherence to the tool; and identify when pharmacists do not adhere to the tool. Methods The PAST was developed by consensus methodology to prioritise departmental workflow for clinical pharmacists. The most pharmaceutically complex patients at the greatest risk of adverse drug events were expected to receive a PAL score of 3, while the least complex receive a PAL of 1. A quasi-experimental service evaluation study was conducted 6 months after implementation of the tool to quantify agreement between pharmacist-documented and expected per-guidance PALs. Patients were selected via random clusters from wards. For each patient, a PAL was calculated by the researcher and compared with the pharmacist-documented PAL.
Trimethoprim resistance is increasingly prevalent in community-acquired urinary infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between exposure to community-prescribed trimethoprim and other risk factors in subjects and subsequent trimethoprim-resistant urinary tract infection. The design was a nested case-control study using a record-linkage database. Study subjects submitted a urine sample to the Ninewells Hospital Laboratory between July 1993 and December 1995. Antibiotic exposure in subjects with trimethoprim-resistant isolates (cases) was compared with antibiotic exposure in subjects with trimethoprim-susceptible isolates (controls). Study subjects were drawn from the catchment area of a large teaching hospital in Tayside, Scotland. There were 13765 males and females aged 1-106 years who submitted their first urine sample for culture during the study period. After adjustment for significant risk factors and confounding variables, logistic regression analysis showed exposure to trimethoprim [odds ratio (OR) 4.35] or any antibiotic other than trimethoprim (OR 1.32) to be predictive of resistance. The growth of Proteus spp. (OR 115.14) and bacterial growth other than Escherichia coli and Proteus spp. (OR 2.83) were also predictor variables. Hospitalization in the previous 6 months was not independently associated with trimethoprim resistance. In conclusion, trimethoprim resistance was independently associated with exposure to trimethoprim and to antibiotics other than trimethoprim. Reduction in trimethoprim prescribing alone may not reduce the prevalence of trimethoprim resistance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.