BackgroundHealth care professionals with positive attitudes towards the functional abilities of patients with low back pain are more likely to encourage activity and avoidance of rest as per recommended guidelines. This study investigated whether medical student training fosters positive attitudes towards patients with back pain and their ability to function.MethodsFirst (n = 202) and final (n = 146) year medical students at the University of Glasgow completed the Health Care Professionals' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) questionnaire. This measures attitudes of clinicians towards the functional ability of patients with back pain. A group of first (n = 62) and final year (n = 61) business students acted as non-health care controls. Attitudes were compared using two-way ANOVA with year of study and discipline of degree as independent variables.ResultsBoth year of study [F(1,465) = 39.5, p < 0.01] and discipline of degree [F(1,465) = 43.6, p < 0.01] had significant effects on total HC-PAIRS scores and there was a significant interaction effect [F(1,465) = 9.5, p < 0.01]. Medical students commenced their course with more positive attitudes than non-health care students (65.7 vs. 69.2 respectively; p < 0.01) - lower scores translating into more positive attitudes. In their final year, the difference between the two student groups had widened (56.4 vs. 65.3; p < 0.01).ConclusionsUndergraduate medical training promotes positive attitudes towards the functional ability of patients with back pain, suggesting that students may be more likely to develop an evidence-based approach to this patient group after qualification. Some adjustments to training may be warranted to encourage a more positive shift in attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of work absence. Assisting individuals back into work is an important part of rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of individuals returning to work after an episode of sickness absence due to LBP. PARTICIPANTS: Five women employed by a UK University who had returned to work. METHOD: In this qualitative study, participants underwent semi-structured interviews about their experiences. The transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Two primary themes emerged 1) perceived pressure to return to work and 2) strategies employed to relieve the pressure to return. Pressure to return to work arose from a number of sources including guilt and a personal work ethic, internally, and from colleagues and management, externally. This pressure led to the individual employing a number of strategies to reduce it. These ranged from a simple denial of health concerns and decision to return to work regardless of their condition, to placing the responsibility of the decision not to return to work onto a significant other, such as a family member or health care professional. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals returning to work with LBP experience considerable pressure to return and use a range of strategies to mediate that pressure.

This paper critically reviews the literature, describing a post-operative phenomenon which is traditionally seen by physiotherapists in the immediate inpatient setting, following neck dissection (ND) for head and neck cancer. The presence and incidence of this condition is explored and the potential impact on the surviving patient's quality of life is considered. The nature and development of shoulder disability following ND is investigated and proposed roles of key anatomical structures involved are considered with relation to pathodynamics. A model for understanding the assessment and holistic management of this condition is offered and the potential implications for physiotherapy practice in primary care are considered.

Patients commonly develop shoulder disability and reduction in quality of life (QOL) following neck dissection surgery. There is a lack of studies investigating the impact of preventative rehabilitation to prevent shoulder disability in this population. An exploratory trial was undertaken to investigate this gap in the head and neck cancer literature. Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to either one of two groups: early physiotherapy for a period of 3 months following surgery and current routine inpatient care and advice. Blinded measurement of shoulder function and QOL were recorded pre-operatively and at 1 year following surgery. No difference was found using between-group analysis (Mann-Whitney U-Test) for any outcome measures observed. Descriptive data analysis suggests that subjects receiving early physiotherapy had a perception of increased physical well-being when compared with subjects receiving routine care. There may be some clinical significance that subjects receiving a course of physiotherapy did appear to rate their physical well-being higher than those subjects not undergoing rehabilitation. Further research to investigate the preventative effects of physiotherapy on this population should consider the use of head and neck cancer-specific outcome measurement of both shoulder disability and QOL.

No abstract

Objective: Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) is a routinely applied treatment modality for various musculoskeletal conditions, including low back pain. The precise mechanisms by which SMT elicits its effects are largely unknown, but recent research supports a multi-system explanation recognizing both biomechanical and neurophysiological mechanisms. Although the evaluation of changes in clinical presentation is complex, objective neurophysiological measures of sensitivity to movement (e.g. neurodynamic tests) can be a valuable clinical indicator in evaluating the effects of SMT. This review aimed to synthesize current literature investigating the effects of SMT on lower limb neurodynamics. Method: Eight electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that applied SMT (against any control) and evaluated lower limb neurodynamics (Passive Straight Leg Raise or Slump Test). Selection and data extraction were conducted by one researcher, reviewed by a second author. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Results: Eight RCTs were included, one with high RoB. SMT produced a clinically meaningful (≥6⁰) difference in five of these studies compared with inert control, hamstring stretching, and as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy, but not compared with standard care, as an adjunct to home exercise and advice, or when comparing different SMT techniques. Findings compared to sham were mixed. When reported, effects tentatively lasted up to 6 weeks postintervention. Conclusion: Limited evidence suggests SMT-improved range of motion and was more effective than some other interventions. Future research, using standardized Neurodynamic tests, should explore technique types and evaluate longer-term effects. Level of Evidence: 1a

Background: Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') attitudes towards pain influence their pain management. Attitudes about pain should be aligned with the evidence-base at the pre-registration stage of an HCP's career but pain education at undergraduate level is often lacking, and negative attitudes can pervade HCP practise. Previous studies investigating change in pain attitudes in undergraduate HCPs are crosssectional in nature and frequently report minimal change in pain attitudes.Objectives: To investigate medical students' attitudes and beliefs towards people with chronic pain over the course of their Scottish undergraduate programme. Design: Five year observational study.Setting: A Scottish university medical school.Participants: Medical students were recruited in first year and followed up to their final year (year one n=205/244, year two n=190/245, year three n=132/279, year four n=110/262, year four n=159/260) for five years.Outcome Measure: The Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS with scores ranging from 15-105) was completed annually.Results: A two-way ANOVA found that attitudes and beliefs improved significantly (p<0.01) from first to final year (10.0±10.0). Medics showed a gradual reduction in scores (signifying improved attitudes) annually.Conclusions: This is the first known published study to chart changes in the same cohort of medical students' attitudes and beliefs towards people with chronic pain over time. Changes in attitudes improved steadily over the five year medical degree course. Future work should explore which aspects of degree courses, if any, impact upon attitudes and beliefs towards people with chronic pain so that courses can be enhanced accordingly. Contribution of the Paper:• This is the first known published observational study of pain attitudes in the same group of medical students from first to final year of undergraduate training.• It confirms the findings from previous cross-sectional literature that there is an improvement in attitudes amongst medical students during the course of their usual undergraduate training.• The change in attitudes whilst of a meaningful magnitude, is relatively modest and there is clear potential for improvement.

No abstract