The objective of this study was to assess the effect of food and timing of meals on the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads. Four different independent, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects (n = 20-30). Didanosine (400 mg) was given concomitantly with a high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce. In addition, didanosine was given 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before and 2 hours after a light meal. Statistical comparison with fasting conditions was made using the equivalence approach for Cmax (70%-143%) and AUC (80%-125%). The high-fat meal, light meal, yogurt, and applesauce decreased the Cmax by 46%, 22%, 30%, and 24%, respectively, and lowered the AUC by 19%, 27%, 20%, and 18%, respectively; statistical analyses indicated an indeterminate food effect, except for the Cmax for the high-fat meal. For 1 hour before meal, Cmax and AUC were lower by 15% and 24% and, for 2 hours after meal, were lower by 15% and 10%, respectively. There was an indeterminate food effect for 1 hour before the meal treatment; in addition, 2 hours after the meal, treatment approached statistical equivalence, missing narrowly on the lower bounds. For 1.5, 2, and 3 hours before meal treatments, Cmax values were unchanged, but AUC was lower by 10%, 4%, and 0%, respectively; lack of food effect was observed for all three treatments. Across studies, median time to Cmix ranged from 1.67 to 2.67 hours but was delayed by 2.5 to 3 hours with high-fat and light meals compared to fasting conditions. The half-life of didanosine was 1.5 to 2 hours. It was concluded that the bioavailability of didanosine from encapsulated enteric-coated beads was reduced by approximately 20% to 25% with food, which can be circumvented by taking didanosine on an empty stomach. The clinical significance of such moderate reductions in didanosine exposure with food, especially as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy, is not clear.
The effects of age on gatifloxacin pharmacokinetic values were largely attributed to declining renal function, whereas those of gender were largely attributed to differences in body weight. These modest age- and gender-related differences do not warrant dosage adjustment.
This article reports the results of an open-label, multiple-dose study to determine percutaneous absorption and pharmacokinetics of eflornithine following topical treatment with eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream (Vaniqa). Ten women with excessive facial hair were treated with two 0.5 g single doses of [14C]-labeled eflornithine HCl 13.9% (w/w) cream (periods A and C) separated by twice-daily application of 0.5 g unlabeled eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream for 7 days (period B). Analysis of radioactivity excreted in urine and feces indicated that percutaneous absorption was minimal. Comparison with urinary excretion of eflornithine in period A suggested that most of absorbed eflornithine was excreted in urine without being metabolized. Radioactivity was not detectable in blood or plasma, but eflornithine concentrations were measurable, with peak concentrations of 4.96 ng/ml in period A and 10.44 ng/ml in period C. Eflornithine was eliminated from plasma with a mean terminal half-life of 11 hours (first application) and 8 hours (final application). Trough plasma concentrations reached steady state (4.61-5.50 ng/ml) after 4 days of twice-daily topical treatment, and multiple dosing had no apparent effect on disposition kinetics. The low degree of percutaneous absorption and low systemic exposure to eflornithine offer a favorable clinical safety profile of eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream.
Didanosine is an acid labile drug and hence has been given with buffering agents. To avoid the need for concurrent administration with antacids, an encapsulated enteric-coated bead formulation of didanosine was developed. The objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of the encapsulated enteric-coated beads compared to the buffered tablet. Two separate open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies were conducted, one in healthy subjects and the other in HIV-infected subjects (with CD4 cell counts > 200 cells/mm3). All subjects received a 400-mg dose of the buffered tablet (reference formulation) and the encapsulated enteric-coated beads (test formulation). Blood samples were collected over 12 hours, and plasma levels of didanosine were determined using a validated assay. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means of log-transformed Cmax and AUCinfinity values were used to assess bioequivalence between the two formulations using the equivalence interval of 0.80 and 1.25. In healthy volunteers (n = 46), the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax and AUCinfinity values were 0.58 (0.52, 0.64) and 1.02 (0.95, 1.01), respectively. In HIV-infected subjects (n = 30), the point estimate and 90% CI of the ratios of Cmax and AUCinfinity values were 0.64 (0.56, 0.72) and 0.95 (0.86, 1.06), respectively. Median t(max) value increased significantly from 0.67 hours for the buffered tablet in both studies to 2.33 hours (in healthy subjects) or 2.0 hours (in HIV-infected subjects) for the enteric-coated beads. The mean half-life of didanosine was similar between treatments and ranged between 1.60 and 1.70 hours across healthy and HIV-infected subjects. It was concluded that the encapsulated enteric-coated bead formulation of didanosine is equivalent to the buffered tablet in the extent of exposure but differs in the rate of absorption. The pharmacokinetic profile of the enteric formulation appears to be similar in healthy and HIV-infected subjects.
These findings indicate that, although no untoward accumulation is anticipated compared with patients with normal hepatic function, patients with hepatic impairment may be exposed to higher concentrations of nefazodone and its metabolites than would subjects with normal hepatic function. Consequently, a lower daily dose of nefazodone should be considered when treating patients with impairment of hepatic function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.