No abstract

No abstract

Potential immediate outcomes of a science field trip are the retention of knowledge associated with the program and an improved attitude toward the site visited during the trip. The length of associated memories regarding this experience are less clear. In an attempt to begin learning more about memorable experiences associated with a science field trip, a 1‐month and an 18‐month evaluation was conducted of elementary school students who had participated in an environmental science program at a community park in a midwestern city. Results of the evaluation found that students' memories were nonspecific and disassociated from information given by the field teacher. On the other hand, results from both tests yielded positive responses toward wanting to learn more about the subject matter and an interest in returning to the field trip site. This would indicate that, while not retaining specific objective‐oriented content, students did gain a positive reaction to returning that continued over the long‐term. Research related to memorable experiences is outlined, using a theory of long‐term memory developed by Tulving (1972) as a basic paradigm of correlation for the subsequent investigation.

The use of conservation easements as a conservation mechanism for private land has increased greatly in the past decade; conservation easements now protect over 15 million ha across the United States from residential and commercial development. We used a mailed survey and in-depth telephone interviews to determine factors that motivate private landowners in Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin (U.S.A.) to place conservation easements on their properties. The mailed survey asked about characteristics of landowners, their properties, and their opinions on 9 factors related to the decision to place an easement. A follow-up telephone interview was completed with 19 mail-survey participants to gain an in-depth understanding of the action and to triangulate the results with the questionnaire. Place attachment, which is a measure of personal connection to a location or property, was the greatest motivation for implementation of an easement. Results of a principal components analysis suggested contributing to the public good underlaid several of the strong motivational factors for participation. Financial reasons were the lowest ranked motivational factor; however, financial concerns may facilitate placement of an easement that would otherwise not be realized. We believe that our results may be transferable to places where land protected by easements is not dominated by traditional farming (row crops, pastures, and hay), timber harvesting, or nonextractive uses (e.g., habitat for wild animals, recreation, and protection of ecosystem services).

No abstract