T he management of hypertension has traditionally been based on the measurement of blood pressure (BP) in the office using manual devices, such as the mercury sphygmoma-nometer. Manual BP measurement is associated with numerous sources of error, the most important of which relate to human behavior. In the office setting, many patients become anxious, health professionals frequently do not follow proper BP measurement technique, and the presence of a nurse or physician leads to conversation, which increases BP. Also, the phasing out of the mercury sphygmomanometer because of concerns about its potential adverse effects on the environment and human health provides further motivation to reexamine the role of manual BP in clinical practice. In recent years, the pre-eminence of office BP has been challenged by the widespread use of 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and self-measurement of BP in the home. The well documented advantages of ABPM 1 and home BP 2 in evaluating the benefits of antihypertensive therapy for individual patients has led to major changes in recent guidelines for the diagnosis of hypertension. ABPM and home BP have been advocated as the methods of choice for determining the BP status of patients, 3-5 whereas manual office BP is being replaced by electronic oscillometric sphygmomanom-eters, most of which are activated by the office staff. Although these semiautomated devices eliminate some of the errors associated with manual BP measurement, the presence of an observer may still provoke inaccurate BP readings. 6,7 This limitation of semiautomated devices has been overcome by the development of accurate oscillometric sphygmo-manometers specifically designed for professional use, which take multiple BP readings automatically with the patient resting quietly and alone, 8 now referred to as automated office BP (AOBP). Numerous studies comparing AOBP to awake ambulatory BP and home BP have shown that AOBP produces Abstract-The risk of cardiovascular events in relation to blood pressure is largely based on readings taken with a mercury sphygmomanometer in populations which differ from those of today in terms of hypertension severity and drug therapy. Given replacement of the mercury sphygmomanometer with electronic devices, we sought to determine the blood pressure threshold for a significant increase in cardiovascular risk using a fully automated device, which takes multiple readings with the subject resting quietly alone. Participants were 3627 community-dwelling residents aged >65 years untreated for hypertension. Automated office blood pressure readings were obtained in a community pharmacy with subjects seated and undisturbed. This method for recording blood pressure produces similar readings in different settings, including a pharmacy and family doctor's office providing the above procedures are followed. Subjects were followed for a mean (SD) of 4.9 (1.0) years for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were computed for 10 mm Hg increme...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.