Asymmetries in movement times of the hands in 60 healthy participants with different patterns of hand-foot dominance were investigated. Handedness and footedness were assessed by means of questionnaires and verified by simple motor tasks. Psychomotor performance was evaluated by the use of selected tests from the computerised Vienna Test System (VST, Vienna, Austria). Movement time (MT) was assessed separately for dominant and non-dominant hands in a unimanual simple reaction task. Participants performed significantly better with their preferred hand, and differences in performance between right- and left-handers were not significant, neither was there a main effect of foot dominance on MT of the hands. However there was a significant effect of laterality pattern in hand-foot combination on hands MT: participants with cross-lateral dominance patterns of hands and feet performed significantly better than those with congruent hand-foot dominance. No significant interaction with sex was found. These results provide evidence for a lack of independence of hand and foot dominance in motor performance, suggesting the functional significance of limb laterality pattern in the motor control system. The results support the hypothesis that the quality of human hand movements may be influenced not only by central information processing (hemispheric specialisation) but also by other structures and processes of motor control, such as central pattern generators (CPGs) and biomechanical factors.
Purpose. This study aimed at measuring the reaction of the hand when tactile feedback was impaired in upper extremity motor performance in order to empirically evaluate how precision was affected during visually controlled hand and arm movement. Methods. 26 right-handed young male adults were tested with the use of a line tracking task by means of schuhfried's Vienna Test system. Tactile feedback during line tracking task was impaired by the use of different gloves: a chirurgical latex glove, a rubber glove and a thick work glove made of soft animal leather. Results. The results found a strong relationship between hand movement accuracy and the degree of tactile impairment; no significant relationship was found between tactile impairment and movement speed. Limiting tactile feedback was found to influence motor task accuracy during local wrist movements (using only the carpal and palm joints), while tasks that allowed global movement (both wrist and forearm) were found to have accuracy influenced only when tactile feedback was highly impaired (line tracking with the thick leather glove). Conclusions. The results have indicated that the role of tactile feedback on accuracy during visually-guided precision movement is far greater than previously reported.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.