A multisubunit complex called cohesin forms a huge ring structure that mediates sister chromatid cohesion, possibly by entrapping sister DNAs following replication. Cohesin's kleisin subunit Scc1 completes the ring, connecting the ABC-like ATPase heads of a V-shaped Smc1/3 heterodimer. Proteolytic cleavage of Scc1 by separase triggers sister chromatid disjunction, presumably by breaking the Scc1 bridge. One half of the SMC-kleisin bridge is revealed here by a crystal structure of Smc1's ATPase complexed with Scc1's C-terminal domain. The latter forms a winged helix that binds a pair of beta strands in Smc1's ATPase head. Mutation of conserved residues within the contact interface destroys Scc1's interaction with Smc1/3 heterodimers and eliminates cohesin function. Interaction of Scc1's N terminus with Smc3 depends on prior C terminus connection with Smc1. There is little or no turnover of Smc1-Scc1 interactions within cohesin complexes in vivo because expression of noncleavable Scc1 after DNA replication does not hinder anaphase.

It is functionally important to differentiate between primary afferent neurons with A-fibers, which are nociceptive or nonnociceptive, and C-fibers, which are mainly nociceptive. Neurochemical markers such as neurofilament 200 (NF200), substance P (SP), and isolectin B4 (IB4) have been useful to distinguish between A- and C-fiber neurons. However, the expression patterns of these markers change after peripheral nerve injury, so that it is not clear whether they still distinguish between fiber types in models of neuropathic pain. We identified neurons with Abeta-, Adelta-, and C-fibers by their conduction velocity (corrected for utilization time) in dorsal root ganglia taken from mice after a chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve and control mice, and later stained them for IB4, SP, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), NF200, and neuropeptide Y (NPY). NF200 remained a good marker for A-fiber neurons, and IB4 and SP remained good markers for C-fiber neurons after CCI. NPY was absent in controls but was expressed in A-fiber neurons after CCI. After CCI, a group of C-fiber neurons emerged that expressed none of the tested markers. The size distribution of the markers was investigated in larger samples of unidentified dorsal root ganglion neurons and, together with the results from the identified neurons, provided only limited evidence for the expression of SP in Abeta-fiber neurons after CCI. The extent of up-regulation of NPY showed a strong inverse correlation with the degree of heat hyperalgesia.

Aberrant GABAergic inhibition in spinal dorsal horn may underlie some forms of neuropathic pain. Potential, but yet unexplored, mechanisms include reduced excitability, abnormal discharge patterns or altered synaptic input of spinal GABAergic neurons. To test these hypotheses, we quantitatively compared active and passive membrane properties, firing patterns in response to depolarizing current steps and synaptic input of GABAergic neurons in spinal dorsal horn lamina II of neuropathic and of control animals. Transgenic mice were used which expressed enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) controlled by the GAD67 promoter, thereby labelling one-third of all spinal GABAergic neurons. In all neuropathic mice included in this study, chronic constriction injury of one sciatic nerve led to tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. Control mice were sham-operated. Membrane excitability of GABAergic neurons from neuropathic or sham-treated animals was indistinguishable. The most frequent firing patterns observed in neuropathic and sham-operated animals were the initial burst (neuropathic: 46%, sham-treated: 42%), the gap (neuropathic: 31%, sham-treated: 29%) and the tonic firing pattern (neuropathic: 16%, sham-treated: 24%). The synaptic input from dorsal root afferents was similar in neuropathic and in control animals. Thus, a reduced membrane excitability, altered firing patterns or changes in synaptic input of this group of GABAergic neurons in lamina II of the spinal cord dorsal horn are unlikely causes for neuropathic pain.

Under physiological conditions, nociceptive information is mainly processed in superficial laminae of the spinal dorsal horn, whereas non-nociceptive information is processed in deeper laminae. Neuropathic pain patients often suffer from touch-evoked pain (allodynia), suggesting that modality borders are disrupted in their nervous system. We studied whether excitation evoked in deep dorsal horn neurons either via stimulation of primary afferent Abeta-fibres, by direct electrical stimulation or via glutamate microinjection leads to activation of neurons in the superficial dorsal horn. We used Ca(2+)-imaging in transversal spinal cord slices of neuropathic and control animals to monitor spread of excitation from the deep to the superficial spinal dorsal horn. In neuropathic but not control animals, a spread of excitation occurred from the deep to the superficial dorsal horn. The spread of excitation was synaptically mediated as it was blocked by the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX. In contrast, block of NMDA receptors was ineffective. In control animals, the violation of modality borders could be reproduced by bath application of GABA(A) and glycine receptor antagonists. Furthermore, we could show that neuropathic animals were more prone to synchronous network activity than control animals. Thus, following peripheral nerve injury, excitation generated in dorsal horn areas which process non-nociceptive information can invade superficial dorsal horn areas which normally receive nociceptive input. This may be a spinal mechanism of touch-evoked pain.