In many fruit trees, heavy fruit load in one year reduces flowering in the following year, creating a biennial fluctuation in yield termed alternate bearing (AB). In subtropical trees, where flowering induction is mostly governed by the accumulation of chilling hours, fruit load is thought to generate a signal (AB signal) that blocks the perception of cold induction. Fruit removal during a heavy-fruit-load year is effective at inducing flowering only if performed one to a few months before the onset of the flowering induction period. We previously showed that following fruit removal, the content of the auxin indoleacetic acid (IAA) in citrus buds is reduced, suggesting that the hormone plays a role in the AB signal. Here, we demonstrate that fruit presence generates relatively strong polar auxin transport in citrus and olive stems. Upon fruit removal, polar auxin transport is reduced and allows auxin release from the bud. Furthermore, using immunolocalization, hormone, and gene expression analyses, we show that in citrus, IAA level in the bud and specifically in the apical meristem is reduced upon fruit removal. Overall, our data provide support for the notion that fruit presence generates an auxin signal in the bud, which may affect flowering induction.
The fruit and seed produced by a small number of crop plants provide the majority of food eaten across the world. Given the growing global population, there is a pressing need to increase yields of these crops without using more land or more chemical inputs. Many of these crops display prominent ‘fruit-flowering feedbacks’, in which fruit produced early in sexual reproductive development can inhibit the production of further fruit by a range of mechanisms. Understanding and over-coming these feedbacks thus presents a plausible route to increasing crop yields ‘for free’. In this review, we define three key types of fruit-flowering feedback, and examine how frequent they are, and their effects on reproduction in a wide range of both wild and cultivated species. We then assess how these phenomenologically distinct phenomena might arise from conserved phytohormonal signalling events, particularly the export of auxin from growing organs. Finally, we offer some thoughts on the evolutionary basis for these self-limiting sexual reproductive patterns, and whether they are also present in the cereal crops that fundamentally underpin global diets.
In many fruit trees, heavy fruit load in one year reduces flowering in the following year, creating a biennial fluctuation in yield termed alternate bearing (AB). In subtropical trees, where flowering induction is mostly governed by the accumulation of cold hours, fruit load is thought to generate a signal (AB signal) that blocks the perception of the cold induction. Fruit removal during a heavy-fruit-load year (On-Crop) is effective at inducing flowering only if performed one to a few months prior to onset of the flowering-induction period. We previously showed that following fruit removal, content of the auxin indoleacetic acid (IAA) in citrus buds is reduced, suggesting that the hormone plays a role in the AB signal. Here, we demonstrate that fruit presence generates relatively strong polar auxin transport (PAT) in citrus and olive stems. Upon fruit removal, PAT is reduced and allows auxin release from the bud. Furthermore, using immunolocalization, hormone and gene expression analyses, we show that in citrus, IAA level in the bud and, specifically, in the apical meristem is reduced upon fruit removal. Overall, our data provide support for the notion that fruit presence generates an auxin signal in the bud which may affect flowering induction.HIGHLIGHTSHeavy fruit load can reduce flowering intensity the following year. Fruit presence, inducing polar auxin transport in stems and inhibiting auxin release from buds, may be a fruit-load signal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.