Introduction Penetrating and perforating ocular trauma is often devastating and may lead to complete visual loss in the traumatized eye and subsequent compromise of the fellow eye. Enucleation is commonly utilized for management of a non-salvageable eye following penetrating and perforating ocular injuries. Recently, the use of evisceration for non-salvageable traumatized eyes has increased. As a technically easier alternative, evisceration offers several advantages to the ocular trauma surgeon to include faster surgical times, better cosmesis and motility, and improved patient outcomes. Debate still persists concerning whether or not evisceration is a viable option in the surgical management of a non-salvageable eye following ocular trauma given the theoretical increased risk of sympathetic ophthalmia and technical difficulty in construction of the scleral shell with extensive and complex corneoscleral lacerations. A retrospective analysis at a level 1 trauma center was performed to evaluate the practicality of evisceration in ocular trauma. Materials and Methods Eyes that underwent evisceration or enucleation following ocular trauma at San Antonio Military Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center, between 01 January 2014 and 30 December 2016 were examined. Factors evaluated include mechanism of injury, defect complexity, ocular trauma score, and time from injury to surgical intervention. Surgical outcomes were assessed. Results In total, 29 eyes were examined, 15 having undergone evisceration and 14 enucleation. The average size of the scleral defect before evisceration was 20 mm in length, and 23 mm before enucleation. The mechanism of injury and characterization of the defects among the two groups were relatively similar and described. Overall comparison of the two study groups in terms of surgical outcomes and complications was also relatively similar, as demonstrated. No cases of postoperative persistent pain, sympathetic ophthalmia, infection, or hematoma were identified for either group. Conclusions The postoperative outcomes demonstrated for the evisceration group are comparable to enucleation, which is consistent with the recent literature. Defect size and complexity did not affect surgical construction of the scleral shell during evisceration. If consistently proven to be a safe and viable alternative to enucleation, evisceration can offer shorter surgical times and better cosmesis for patients. More research into the long-term complication rates and more cases of evisceration for use following ocular trauma should be assessed. Still, this analysis demonstrates that evisceration is a viable surgical alternative and perhaps superior to enucleation for the management of a non-salvageable eye following extensive ocular trauma in many cases.
Introduction Diplopia and strabismus are known complications after corneal refractive surgery (CRS). Within the U.S. Armed Forces, refractive surgery is used to improve the operational readiness of the service member, and these complications could cause significant degradation to their capability. This study was performed in order to identify the incidence of strabismus and diplopia following CRS within the U.S. Military Health System. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in the Department of Defense from January 2006 through September 2013 was designed and approved by the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Institutional Review Board. The military health system data mart was queried for all patients who underwent one of these procedures and subsequently had an International Classification of Disease-9 code for any strabismus or diplopia through 2014 allowing at least 1 year of follow-up. We then calculated the incidence of both diplopia and strabismus for these procedures as the primary measure and the overall prevalence as a secondary measure. Results A total of 108,157 patients underwent PRK or LASIK during our study period with 41 of these patients subsequently having a diagnosis of diplopia or strabismus. After chart review, 16 of these patients were excluded resulting in 25 patients for inclusion in either the strabismus (23 patients, 0.02%) or diplopia (3 patients, 0.003%) cohorts with one patient having both. Of the 23 patients with postoperative strabismus, 4 were new cases giving an incidence of 0.004% and 2 new cases of diplopia for an incidence of 0.002%. Conclusion Diplopia and strabismus are rare complications after CRS in the U.S. military population. These procedures continue to increase the operational readiness of our service members with minimal risk of these potentially debilitating complications. Overall, this study provides support for the continued use of PRK and LASIK despite study limitations related to the use of large databases for retrospective review. Future prospective studies using delineated preoperative and postoperative examinations with sensorimotor testing included may be able to resolve the limitations of this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.