Background: Internationally, there is a growing concern for developing STEM education to prepare students for a scientifically and technologically advanced society. Despite educational bodies lobbying for an increased focus on STEM, there is limited research on how engineering might be incorporated especially in the elementary school curriculum. A framework of five comprehensive core engineering design processes (problem scoping, idea generation, design and construction, design evaluation, redesign), adapted from the literature on design thinking in young children, served as a basis for the study. We report on a qualitative study of fourth-grade students' developments in working an aerospace problem, which took place during the first year of a 3-year longitudinal study. Students applied design processes together with their mathematics and science knowledge to the design and redesign of a 3-D model plane. Results: The study shows that through an aerospace engineering problem, students could complete initial designs and redesigns of a model plane at varying levels of sophistication. Three levels of increasing sophistication in students' sketches were identified in their designs and redesigns. The second level was the most prevalent involving drawings or templates of planes together with an indication of how to fold the materials as well as measurements linked to the plane's construction. The third level incorporated written instructions and calculations. Students' engagement with each of the framework's design processes revealed problem scoping components in their initial designs and redesigns. Furthermore, students' recommendations for improving their launching techniques revealed an ability to apply their mathematics knowledge in conjunction with their science learning on the forces of flight. Students' addition of context was evident together with an awareness of constraints and a consideration of what was feasible in their design creation. Interestingly, students' application of disciplinary knowledge occurred more frequently in the last two phases of the engineering framework (i.e., design evaluation and redesign), highlighting the need for students to reach these final phases to enable the science and mathematics ideas to emerge.
The role of emotion during learning encounters in science teacher education is underresearched and under-theorized. In this case study, we explore the emotional climates (ECs), that is, the collective states of emotional arousal, of a preservice secondary science education class to illuminate practice for producing and reproducing high quality learning experiences for preservice science teachers. Theories related to the sociology of emotions informed our analyses from data sources such as preservice teachers' perceptions of the EC of their class, emotional facial expressions, classroom conversations, and cogenerative dialogue. The major outcome from our analyses was that even though preservice teachers reported high positive EC during the professor's science demonstrations, they also valued the professor's in the moment reflections on her teaching that were associated with low EC ratings. We co-relate EC data and preservice teachers' comments during cogenerative dialogue to expand our understanding of high quality experiences and EC in science teacher education. Our study also contributes refinements to research perspectives on EC.Despite a longstanding interest in research on the effectiveness of science-teacher education programs (e.g., James, 1971), few studies have investigated the synergy between emotions, emotional climate (EC), and the quality of science teacher education in university classes. Briefly, EC refers to the collective experience of emotional arousal that develops among groups of people. James' (1971) work provides one example of early interest on the role of general affective states (i.e., attitudes) in preservice science teacher education. Her study explored whether three different supervisory models used in conjunction with practicum had any effect on preservice science teachers' attitudes toward a desirable teaching strategy (i.e., an inductive-indirect teaching technique). Relationships between teacher attitudes and the teaching technique were established through statistical analyses of pre-and post-test data from questionnaires. The group of teachers who received traditional visits from a university supervisor supplemented by self-evaluation sessions using video data of their teaching showed the largest change toward the desired teaching
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations –citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.