The present comment examines to what extent science communication has attained the status of an academic discipline and a distinct research field, as opposed to the common view that science communication is merely a sub-discipline of media studies In his review How to establish PCST. Two handbooks on science communication (JCOM 7(4) December 2008), Alessandro Delfanti queries a claim in the bookCommunicating science in social contexts that science communication already 'is a distinct research field'. He sees in both books 'an explicit effort to establish PCST as an independent academic field, different from both science and technology studies and communication and media theory'.After pondering the question of whether we really need the creation of a new discipline such as public communication of science, Delfanti concludes that despite the growing strength and quality of the field, PCST still has some work to do if it is to distinguish itself as separate from fields such as science and technology studies, and media and communication studies. JCOM has asked the editors of the books to respond: "Starting from the experience of your book, it would be interesting for us to have a contribution concerning what is "specific" of science communication research. What does distinguish it from something that could be considered a sub-discipline of media studies, sociology of science or history of science? In addition, which is the relation between research in science communication and the more general field of Science and Technology Studies? In other words, why does science communication deserve a special attention as an academic discipline?'We may not be able to demonstrate to everyone's satisfaction that science communication has attained the status of 'a discipline'. Apart from anything else, the definitions are varied and the ground is hotly contested. What we can do, though, is to chart the progress science communication has made as an emerging subject over the last 50 years in terms of a number of measures.Science communication has established an identity over the last 50 years. In the aftermath of WW2, governments increasingly regarded science as important. At the same time they recognised their own lack of skills in the area, so appointed special advisors to lead presidents and politicians through science-based issues.James Killian was appointed in 1957 as Special Assistant to the US President for Science and Technology, followed in 1965 by Sir Solly Zuckerman's appointment as Chief Scientific Adviser in the UK 1 . These were the first two advisers and others followed, all performing a classic communication role of translating the significance of research results for a lay audience. A little earlier, "science communication (or popularization)" had been enshrined in the constitutions of both India and China. So the subject had a political imperative.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.