Optimal curves differing by a 3-isogeny by Dongho Byeon and Donggeon Yhee (Seoul) 1. Introduction. For a positive integer N , let X 1 (N ) = H * /Γ 1 (N ) and X 0 (N ) = H * /Γ 0 (N ) denote the usual modular curves. Let C denote an isogeny class of elliptic curves defined over Q of conductor N . For i = 0, 1, there is a unique curve E i ∈ C and a parametrization φ i : X i (N ) → E i such that for any E ∈ C and parametrization φ i : X i (N ) → E, there is an isogenyIt seems that for most isogeny classes C, E 0 and E 1 are the same. However, there are examples where they differ. For example, E 0 = X 0 (11) and E 1 = X 1 (11) differ by a 5-isogeny. Stein and Watkins [SW] have made a precise conjecture about when E 0 and E 1 differ by a 2-isogeny or a 3-isogeny, based on numerical observations. For the 3-isogeny case, the conjecture is the following.Conjecture (Stein and Watkins). For i = 0, 1, let E i be the X i (N )optimal curve of an isogeny class C of elliptic curves defined over Q of conductor N . Then the following statements are equivalent:(A) There is an elliptic curve E ∈ C given by E : y 2 + axy + y = x 3 with discriminant a 3 − 27 = (a − 3)(a 2 + 3a + 9), where a is an integer such that no prime factors of a − 3 are congruent to 1 modulo 6 and a 2 + 3a + 9 is a power of a prime number. (B) E 0 and E 1 differ by a 3-isogeny.Remark. This conjecture has to be modified because (B) does not imply (A) in general. For example, let C be the isogeny class consisting of the two elliptic curves 396C1 and 396C2 in Cremona's table. Then E 0 = 396C1 and E 1 = 396C2 differ by a 3-isogeny, but (A) is not true in this case.In this paper, we prove the following theorem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.