Within the airway management field, simulation has been used as a tool of training for over 40 years. Simulation training offers a chance of active involvement for the trainees. It can effectively enhance and upgrade the knowledge and skills of the trainees in airway management, and subsequently decrease medical errors and improve patients' outcomes and safety through a variety of airway management training modalities, such as common airway skills, difficult airway management strategies, and crisis management skills. To perform simulation-based airway management training effectively, not only are task trainers and high-fidelity simulators required but also instructors with rich experience in airway management simulation training and optimal curriculum design are essential.
Background:We aimed to evaluate the correlation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer and under neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Materials and methods:We performed a systematical search using Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 2018. On the basis of the data directly obtained from the available studies, the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled on the basis of higher or lower NLR levels.Results:The meta-analysis showed that high NLR was significantly associated with poor NAC response (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.46–3.53, P < .001) but not with the DFS (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.78–1.78, P = .435) and OS (OR = 2.781, 95% CI: 0.54–14.32, P = .221).Conclusion:Although high NLR was significantly associated with poor pathological response, we were unable to demonstrate the prognostic value of NLR for DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer who were undergoing NAC.
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) suppresses inflammatory responses and protects against organ injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of DEX on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and allergic airway inflammation, as well as its underlying mechanism of action in a murine model of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma. A total of 30 female BALB/c mice were divided into 6 groups (n=5 mice/group): Control, OVA, OVA + DEX (20, 30 or 50 µg/kg) and OVA + TAK-242 [a toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) inhibitor]. The mice were intraperitoneally injected with 20, 30 or 50 µg/kg DEX 1 h before OVA challenge. AHR to inhaled methacholine (Mch) was measured, and the mice were sacrificed 24 h after the last challenge. AHR following Mch inhalation was measured using the FlexiVent apparatus. Hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and Wright-Giemsa staining was performed to evaluate inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung tissue. The levels of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were analyzed using ELISA, and their mRNA expression levels in the lung tissue were examined using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The protein expression of TLR4, NF-κB and phosphorylated (p) NF-κB in the lung tissue was also detected using immunohistochemistry. In the murine OVA-induced asthma model, DEX decreased AHR following Mch inhalation and reduced the infiltration of inflammatory cells. IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were significantly lower following DEX treatment. Furthermore, DEX treatment inhibited the expression of TLR4, NF-κB and p-NF-κB in the lung tissue and exhibited a similar effect to TAK-242 treatment. In conclusion, DEX may attenuate AHR and allergic airway inflammation by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB pathway. These results suggested that DEX may represent a potential anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment and management of patients with asthma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.