This study shows that therapeutic drug monitoring is indicated in patients with a voriconazole-related SAE and that dose adjustment is required if the trough concentration of voriconazole exceeds 5.83 mg/l.

This study was performed to estimate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of etanercept in pediatric juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) patients and to compare the steady-state time-concentration profiles between etanercept 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly subcutaneous (SC) regimens by clinical trial simulation. To this end, mixed-effect analysis (NONMEM, Version 5.1) was performed using the etanercept PK database consisting of 69 JRA patients (4-17 years). Based on the population PK parameters obtained herein, a Monte Carlo clinical trial simulation experiment was conducted to compare the PK profiles in 200 virtual JRA patients who randomly received either etanercept 0.4 mg/kg SC twice weekly or 0.8 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks. The following population PK model could adequately describe etanercept PK profiles for twice-weekly SC dosing of 0.4 mg/kg: CL/F (L/h)=0.0576 (female) or 0.0772 (male) x (body surface area in m2/1.071)1.41, V/F(L)=7.88 x (body weight in kg/30.8). The means +/- standard deviations of simulated trough concentrations for 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly dosing regimens were 1.58 +/- 1.07 mg/L and 1.92 +/- 1.09 mg/L, respectively. Peaks during 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly dosing (2.92 +/- 1.41 mg/L) were only 11% higher than during 0.4 mg/kg twice-weekly dosing (2.62 +/- 1.23 mg/L). In conclusion, the clinical trial simulation confirmed that 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly SC regimens of etanercept are expected to yield overlapping steady-state time-concentration profiles, leading to equivalent clinical outcomes. This has been the basis of the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of the 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly regimen in pediatric patients with JRA.

The End-of-Phase 2A meetings are proposed to identify opportunities to make innovative medical products available sooner and to increase the quality of drug applications through early meetings between sponsors and the FDA. This article summarizes the overall experience across 11 pilot End-of-Phase 2A meetings since 2004. Four case studies are presented in more detail to demonstrate the various issues and methods encountered at these meetings. Overall, industry and FDA scientists ranked these meetings to be "very helpful" (average score of 4 on a scale of 1 to 5). In almost all the instances the sponsors changed their drug development plans subsequent to these extensive quantitative analyses-based meetings. A draft Guidance is being developed to be issued in 2008, and we hope this initiative will be resourced by then.

Our results show that CYP2C19 is an important enzyme in the elimination of moclobemide and that it is extensively inhibited by omeprazole in extensive metabolizers, but not in poor metabolizers.

The population clearance and volume of distribution in our burn patients were significantly greater than those reported in non-burn patients. The simulation of 1000 virtual patients' plasma meropenem concentration treated with 1000 mg (30 min infusion) every 8 h based upon the model predicted the probability of achieving the time above MIC >40% of the dosing interval as 58.9% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from three university hospitals in Korea.

No abstract

Aims The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its metabolites in healthy subjects were evaluated to determine if a single dose of moclobemide inhibited CYP2C19 activity. Methods Sixteen volunteers, of whom eight were extensive metabolizers (EM) and eight were poor metabolizers for CYP2C19, participated in two studies. Venous blood samples were collected for 24 h after oral ingestion of 40 mg omeprazole with or without 300 mg moclobemide coadministration. The pharmacokinetic change of omeprazole, omeprazole sulphone and 5-hydroxyomeprazole concentrations were assessed to test for an interaction between omeprazole and moclobemide. Results The coadministration of moclobemide in EMs approximately doubled the mean AUC (from 1834 to 3760 ng ml x1 h) and C max (from 987 to 1649 ng ml x1 )of omeprazole, and increased the AUC of omeprazole sulphone without changing AUC ratio of omeprazole to omeprazole sulphone. Moclobemide coadministration more than doubled the AUC ratio of omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole (from 2.5 to 5.3) in EMs, too. There was a significant decrease in C max and AUC of 5-hydroxyomeprazole in PMs but no significant changes were seen in the results for omeprazole and omeprazole sulphone AUCs.Conclusions A single dose of moclobemide resulted in significant suppression of CYP2C19 activity in EMs. We conclude that physicians prescribing moclobemide should pay attention to its pharmacokinetic interactions even on the first day of coadministration with CYP2C19 substrates.

The combination of capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) twice daily and everolimus 5 mg twice daily was found to be effective in a small subset of GC patients who were heavily pre-treated.