We have investigated the role of somatostatin receptor subtypes sst2 and sst4 in limbic seizures and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission in mouse hippocampus. As compared to wild-type littermates, homozygous mice lacking sst2 receptors showed a 52% reduction in EEG ictal activity induced by intrahippocampal injection of 30 ng kainic acid (P < 0.05). The number of behavioural tonic-clonic seizures was reduced by 50% (P < 0.01) and the time to onset of seizures was doubled on average (P < 0.05). Seizure-associated neurodegeneration was found in the injected hippocampus (CA1, CA3 and hilar interneurons) and sporadically in the ipsilateral latero-dorsal thalamus. This occurred to a similar extent in wild-type and sst2 knock-out mice. Intrahippocampal injection of three selective sst2 receptor agonists in wild-type mice (Octreotide, BIM 23120 and L-779976, 1.5-6.0 nmol) did not affect kainate seizures while the same compounds significantly reduced seizures in rats. L-803087 (5 nmol), a selective sst4 receptor agonist, doubled seizure activity in wild-type mice on average. Interestingly, this effect was blocked by 3 nmol octreotide. It was determined, in both radioligand binding and cAMP accumulation, that octreotide had no direct agonist or antagonist action at mouse sst4 receptors expressed in CCl39 cells, up to micromolar concentrations. In hippocampal slices from wild-type mice, octreotide (2 micro m) did not modify AMPA-mediated synaptic responses while facilitation occurred with L-803087 (2 micro m). Similarly to what was observed in seizures, the effect of L-803087 was reduced by octreotide. In hippocampal slices from sst2 knock-out mice, both octreotide and L-803087 were ineffective on synaptic responses. Our findings show that, unlike in rats, sst2 receptors in mice do not mediate anticonvulsant effects. Moreover, stimulation of sst4 receptors in the hippocampus of wild-type mice induced excitatory effects which appeared to depend on the presence of sst2 subtypes, suggesting these receptors are functionally coupled.

No abstract

No abstract

Somatostatin-14 (SRIF) co-localizes with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the hippocampus and regulates neuronal excitability. A role of SRIF in the control of seizures has been proposed, although its exact contribution requires some clarification. In particular, SRIF knockout (KO) mice do not exhibit spontaneous seizures, indicating that compensatory changes may occur in KO. In the KO hippocampus, we examined whether specific SRIF receptors and/or the cognate peptide cortistatin-14 (CST) compensate for the absence of SRIF. We found increased levels of both sst2 receptors (sst2) and CST, and we explored the functional consequences of sst2 compensation on bursting activity and synaptic responses in hippocampal slices. Bursting was decreased by SRIF in wild-type (WT) mice, but it was not affected by either CST or sst2 agonist and antagonist. sst4 agonist increased bursting frequency in either WT or KO. In WT, but not in KO, its effects were blocked by agonizing or antagonizing sst2, suggesting that sst2 and sst4 are functionally coupled in the WT hippocampus. Bursting was reduced in KO as compared with WT and was increased upon application of sst2 antagonist, while SRIF, CST and sst2 agonist had no effect. At the synaptic level, we observed that in WT, SRIF decreased excitatory postsynaptic potentials which were, in contrast, increased by sst2 antagonist in KO. We conclude that sst2 compensates for SRIF absence and that its upregulation is responsible for reduced bursting and decreased excitatory transmission in KO mice. We suggest that a critical density of sst2 is needed to control hippocampal activity.

No abstract

1 The mouse corticotroph tumour cell line AtT-20 is a useful model to investigate the physiological role of native somatostatin (SRIF, Somatotropin release inhibitory factor) receptor subtypes (sst 1 -sst 5 ). The objective of this study was to characterise the pharmacological features and the functional effects of SRIF receptors expressed by 4 SRIF analogues inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels depending on concentration. sst 2/5 receptor-selective ligands were highly potent, whereas sst 1/3/4 receptor-selective ligands had no significant effects. The sst 2 receptor antagonist D-Tyr 8 -CYN 154806 competitively antagonised the effects of SRIF-14 and sst 2 receptor-preferring agonists, but not those of L-817,818. 5 The complex binding properties of SRIF receptor analogues indicate that sst 2 and sst 5 receptors are the predominant SRIF receptors expressed on AtT-20 cell membranes with no or only negligible presence of sst 1 , sst 3 and sst 4 receptors. In the functional studies using cAMP accumulation, only sst 2 and sst 5 receptors appear to play a role. However, the 'predominant' receptor appears to be the sst 2 receptor, although sst 5 receptors can also mediate the effect, when the ligand is not able to activate sst 2 receptors. This clearly adds flexibility to SRIF-mediated functional effects and suggests that the physiological role of SRIF and its analogues may be mediated preferentially via one subtype over another.

Of the five cloned somatostatin (SRIF: somatotropin release inhibitory factor) receptors (sst1-5), only sst2 and sst5 receptors appear to be endogenously expressed and functionally active in AtT-20 mouse anterior pituitary tumour cells. In this study, the presence and the functional coupling of SRIF receptors to G-protein in AtT-20 cells was evaluated by receptor autoradiography and guanosine-5'-Omicron-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding, respectively. In addition, transcriptional effects via the serum response element (SRE) were assessed in AtT-20-SRE-luci cells, engineered to express constitutively SRE upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. [125I]LTT-SRIF-28, [125I]CGP 23996 and [125I]Tyr3-octreotide binding illustrates the high level of sst2/5 receptor in AtT-20 cell membranes. SRIF-14 and SRIF-28 produced a concentration-dependent increase in [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=6.72 and 7.45; Emax=79 and 74.9, respectively) which was completely abolished by pertussis toxin. sst2/5 receptor-selective ligands caused a concentration-dependent increase in [35S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC50=7.74-5.84; Emax=76.6-20.2) while sst1/3/4 receptor-selective ligands were devoid of activity. The binding profiles of [125I]LTT-SRIF-28 and the inhibition of cAMP accumulation correlated highly significantly with their corresponding [35S]GTPgammaS binding profiles (r=0.862 and 0.874, respectively). The effects of the sst2 receptor-preferring agonists Tyr3-octreotide and BIM 23027 on [35S]GTPgammaS binding, but not those of SRIF-14 and the sst5/1 receptor selective-agonist L-817,818, were competitively antagonised by the sst2 receptor antagonist d-Tyr8-CYN 154806 (pKB=7.36 and 7.72, respectively; slope factors not significantly different from unity). In AtT-20-SRE-luci cells, which carry a SRE-luciferase construct functioning in a very efficient manner, SRIF and its analogues did not affect luciferase activity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that in AtT-20 cells the expression of sst2 and sst5 receptors fit with their functional coupling to G(i/o)-proteins. The pharmacological implications of the existence of different ligand/receptor complexes are discussed. However, the intracellular pathways coupled to the activation of sst2 and sst5 receptors appear not to modulate the SRE-mediated transcriptional activity, suggesting that SRIF effects on gene expression coupled to mechanisms that have promoters other than SRE.

No abstract