Pharmacometrics and the application of population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling play a crucial role in clinical pharmacology. These methods, which describe data with well‐defined equations and estimate physiologically interpretable parameters, have not changed substantially during the past decades. Although the methods have proven their usefulness, they are often resource intensive and require a high level of expertise. We investigated whether a method based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) may provide an alternative approach for the prediction of concentration‐time curve to supplement the gold standard methods. In this work, we used simulated data to overcome the requirement for a large clinical training data set, implemented a pharmacologically reasonable network architecture to improve extrapolation to different dosing schemes, and used transfer learning to quickly adapt the predictions to new patient groups. We demonstrate that ANNs are able to learn the shape of concentration‐time curves and make individual predictions based on a short sequence of PK measurements. Furthermore, an ANN trained on simulated data was applied to real clinical data and was demonstrated to extrapolate to different dosing schemes. We also adapted the ANN trained on simulated healthy subjects to simulated hepatic impaired patients through transfer learning. In summary, we demonstrate how ANNs could be leveraged in a PK workflow to efficiently make individual concentration‐time predictions, and we discuss the current limitations and advantages of such an ANN‐based method.
Extending the potential of precision dosing requires evaluating methodologies offering more flexibility and higher degree of personalization. Reinforcement learning (RL) holds promise in its ability to integrate multidimensional data in an adaptive process built toward efficient decision making centered on sustainable value creation. For general anesthesia in intensive care units, RL is applied and automatically adjusts dosing through monitoring of patient's consciousness. We further explore the problem of optimal control of anesthesia with propofol by combining RL with state‐of‐the‐art tools used to inform dosing in drug development. In particular, we used pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic (PK‐PD) modeling as a simulation engine to generate experience from dosing scenarios, which cannot be tested experimentally. Through simulations, we show that, when learning from retrospective trial data, more than 100 patients are needed to reach an accuracy within the range of what is achieved with a standard dosing solution. However, embedding a model of drug effect within the RL algorithm improves accuracy by reducing errors to target by 90% through learning to take dosing actions maximizing long‐term benefit. Data residual variability impacts accuracy while the algorithm efficiently coped with up to 50% interindividual variability in the PK and 25% in the PD model's parameters. We illustrate how extending the state definition of the RL agent with meaningful variables is key to achieve high accuracy of optimal dosing policy. These results suggest that RL constitutes an attractive approach for precision dosing when rich data are available or when complemented with synthetic data from model‐based tools used in model‐informed drug development.
Missing data create challenges in clinical research because they lead to loss of statistical power and potentially to biased results. Missing covariate data must be handled with suitable approaches to prepare datasets for pharmacometric analyses, such as population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. To this end, various statistical methods have been widely adopted. Here, we introduce two machinelearning (ML) methods capable of imputing missing covariate data in a pharmacometric setting. Based on a previously published pharmacometric analysis, we simulated multiple missing data scenarios. We compared the performance of four established statistical methods, listwise deletion, mean imputation, standard multiple imputation (hereafter "Norm"), and predictive mean matching (PMM) and two ML based methods, random forest (RF) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), to handle missing covariate data in a statistically plausible manner. The investigated ML-based methods can be used to impute missing covariate data in a pharmacometric setting. Both traditional imputation approaches and ML-based methods perform well in the scenarios studied, with some restrictions for individual methods.The three methods exhibiting the best performance in terms of least bias for the investigated scenarios are the statistical method PMM and the two ML-based methods RF and ANN. ML-based approaches had comparable good results to the best performing established method PMM. Furthermore, ML methods provide added flexibility when encountering more complex nonlinear relationships, especially when associated parameters are suitably tuned to enhance predictive performance. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?Missing covariate data is an important topic in the context of pharmacometric analyses. Currently, covariate imputation is handled with standard statistical methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.