Because of high tendency of the prion protein (PrP) to aggregate, the exact PrP isoform responsible for prion diseases as well as the pathological mechanism that it activates remains still controversial. In this study, we show that a prefibrillar, monomeric or small oligomeric conformation of the human PrP fragment 90-231 (hPrP90-231), rather than soluble or fibrillar large aggregates, represents the neurotoxic species. In particular, we demonstrate that monomeric milddenatured hPrP90-231 (incubated for 1 h at 53°C) induces SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell death, while, when structured in large aggregates, it is ineffective. Using spectroscopic and cellular techniques we demonstrate that this toxic conformer is characterized by a high exposure of hydrophobic regions that favors the intracellular accumulation of the protein. Inside the cells hPrP90-231 is mainly compartmentalized into the lysosomes where it may trigger pro-apoptotic 'cell death' signals. The PrP toxic conformation, which we have obtained inducing a controlled in vitro conformational change of the protein, might mimic mild-unfolding events occurring in vivo, in the presence of specific mutations, oxidative reactions or proteolysis. Thus, in light of this model, we propose that novel therapeutic strategies, designed to inhibit the interaction of the toxic PrP with the plasmamembrane, could be beneficial to prevent the formation of intracellular neurotoxic aggregates and ultimately the neuronal death. Keywords: intracellular internalization, neurotoxicity, protein aggregation, PrP90-231. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), or prion diseases, are a group of neurodegenerative diseases that recognize as etiopathologic agent an aberrant isoform of the cellular prion protein (PrP C ), named PrP Sc (Prusiner 1998). PrP C is a ubiquitous membrane-bound protein, highly concentrated in the central nervous system in both neurons and glial cells, whose physiological function is still largely unknown. In PrP Sc large portions of the protein N-Terminus adopt a b-sheet configuration, being this feature the main difference between PrP c and PrP Sc (Prusiner 1991). In the past few years a large number of data has been published to better characterize both the molecular mechanisms involved in the conversion of PrP C into PrP Sc (Aguzzi 2006) and the intracellular signaling by which PrP Sc (Muller et al. 1993;Hetz et al. 2003), or some cytotoxic fragments derived from its sequence, may induce cell death (Forloni et al. 1993;Brown et al. 1996;Florio et al. 1998; Thellung et al. 2000a,b). To explain prion infectivity it was postulated that the pathogenic PrP Sc self-propagates in an autocatalytic manner using PrP C as a substrate (Prusiner 1982).A novel concept emerging in prion diseases research is represented by the dissociation between prion transmissibility/ These authors equally contributed and should be both considered as first author.2 Joint last and corresponding authors.Abbreviations used: CD, circular dichroism; hPrP90-231, human PrP fragment 9...